Posted on 03/18/2011 4:59:53 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
Video: Author Jack Cashill appeared on the Peter Boyles Radio Show to discuss Cashill's recent piece on Obama's social security number problem. Jack Cashill is the author of the new book titled, "Deconstructing Obama"... You can order Cashill's new book here or here. The interview aired on 3/18/2011. Bonus video regarding Obama's SS# embedded below...
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
From post 8 about leaders of Congress had a meeting to discuss Hussein’s eligibility -
Anyone from Senator John Boozman’s (R - Arkansas) district who can follow up on this? Get a statement from Boozman as to when this meeting was and which congresscritters were there.
I’m confused. Why Boozman? He a new guy. Why not ask Boehner? He was bound to have been there. If he cannot produce this info. then he has something to hide. There is no speculation. Truth is truth.
Thank you, I have probably 10,000 books stored in two trailers and in my house, I swear I could retire just selling a couple each day on Ebay, but since the Kindle came out many people see an advantage of instant downloads.
And where I live the bookstore rarely carries more than just the bestsellers and the high profit margin stuff.
Just got it in the mail today and can’t put it down.
Because Boozman's office made the statement, not Boehner's office. Boozman took office Jan. 2011. If he attended the meeting then it would have been a recent event. If it was a recent event, then what has come out recently to bring about the meeting? If it happened prior to him taking office then he wasn't involved so why was his office aware of the meeting and who has been discussing the meeting with his office so much so that news of it was given over the phone by some lowling?
Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants...
Don't let anyone tell you that there was no SS System in 1890; therefore, no SS # was issued to a person in 1890! It was issued to a man BORN in 1890. Big difference.
Playing with omissions doesn't cut it.
Language games is one of my inventions!
Papa Alinsky
So, Boozman's office made this statement???? Were you the one who called them?
I guess I am trying to get clear how this originated. Maybe I need more coffee! LOL!
Jack Cashill is an investigative journalist............ His Book Is factual & enlightening!!
It is about time someone expose this “Fraud” in Our WH
Obama needs to be in JAIL!!!!!
Jack Cashill is an investigative journalist............ His Book Is factual & enlightening!!
It is about time someone expose this “Fraud” in Our WH
Obama needs to be in JAIL!!!!!
Maybe she/they meant this memo, which was written especially for Congress, so they can coordinate (cut and paste) their reponses:
It won’t take you long to figure out how full of bull it is. And what the purpose of it was. To deceive the lazy and gullible. These guys and gals don’t do their own legwork. They are at the mercy of their staffs, who actually could be corruptible. Or have loyalties that lie elsewhere. Who can say? These guys and gals don’t even bother to read legislation that they vote on and which, of course, was written for them, so they don’t know what’s in it unless they read it, which they don’t.
We are at the mercy of aides and scribes who write a liberal wish list and then the Congressmen/Senators come bumbling in from long lunches and call us stupid subversive fools when we ask WTH is in that (*^#%Y(^& bill!
Thank you! I will study this. You may have found the origin. I agree, too, with the thoughts you expressed. Mind-boggling at times!
Okay, I have just read the first page and am already wondering...am I the last person in America to see this?? I am printing the document to read carefully later.
We were had. Plain and simple.
No doubt the philosophy behind the perpetrators is “all’s fair in love and war...the end justifies the means.”
One thing they might have forgotten...what goes around, comes around.
You must of had erroneous information.
I didn’t have erroneous information; I had the Social Security numbers and the background information themselves. So which one of us is right?
Social Security numbers have always been assigned according to the criteria given by the SSA, so I am right, meaning that you obviously had erroneous information, making you wrong.
It’s been out there for a while, but I don’t recall where I first saw it. It explains all the similar responses and that they likely came from staffers. Not unlike how the Journo-list coordinated the official meme that would go out as so-called news.
It’s been out there for a while, but I don’t recall where I first saw it. It explains all the similar responses and that they likely came from staffers. Not unlike how the Journo-list coordinated the official meme that would go out as so-called news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.