Anti-gravity: Science Fiction or Real Science? Interview with Gregory Daigle, Author of Gravity 2.0

Free Energy Times ^ | Mar 14, 2011

[Dead Corpse]

The assumption is that it is an analog to electro-magnetics. A negative attractive force and a positive repulsing force.

[Carbonsteel]

Ping.

[Larry Lucido]

I’m generally pro-gravity, but I’m open to hear the anti-gravity argument.

[Constitution Day]

As long as they don't bring in Wile E. Coyote, Super Genius, in as a consultant, there MAY be something to this project.

[lafroste]

Something interesting is that it was GPS that proved a part of Einstein's theory of special relativity. The problem was that things on the earth kept shifting because their coordinates kept changing. GPS relies on very specific time-keeping. What was discovered was that time "runs" at a different rate in orbit than it does on the surface of the earth, and they realized that regular time updates needed to be made. And that's because gravity effects the rate at which time "runs."

Gravity does not affect the rate at which time runs. It's the opposite:gravity is caused by time fields. If you calculate the flow of time on the ground versus the flow of time at an altitude of 175 miles, you will note that time on the ground lags the flow of time at that altitude by about one second every 85 years, a very small differential.

[Yo-Yo]

Sorry, I only believe Richard Hoagland.

http://www.enterprisemission.com/antigrav.html

[Impy]

The Jetsons was a lie! I want flying cars!