Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Errant
Problem is, he doesn't know the model of reactor in question.

The GE BWR-1 at Fukashima does not have a 3rd containment vessel like we had at TMI.

34 posted on 03/13/2011 11:04:18 AM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner
The GE BWR-1 at Fukashima does not have a 3rd containment vessel like we had at TMI.

I caught that from the diagrams shown.

Thanks,

38 posted on 03/13/2011 11:11:32 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner
GE BWR-1 at Fukashima

BWRs come in flavors from BWR-2 (Nine Mile, Oyster Creek) to BWR-6 like Grand Gulf. Those BWR models are housed in containments that come in three flavors, Mark I (like Fukushima Daiichi No. 1), Mark II (like Limerick), and Mark III (like Grand Gulf). Containment is achieved via the fuel rods, the reactor vessel, and the containment vessel. The term "3rd containment" is not used in the industry.
40 posted on 03/13/2011 11:18:03 AM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner; Errant

“Problem is, he doesn’t know the model of reactor in question.
The GE BWR-1 at Fukashima...”

—This isn’t correct. Fukushima reactors are all BWR-3 and higher:

http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/CNPP2010_CD/pages/AnnexII/tables/table2.htm


53 posted on 03/13/2011 12:43:59 PM PDT by Qbert ("I seem to smell the stench of appeasement in the air" - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson