Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers

So Palin endorsed a RINO, because of her “electability?” Wasn’t Chuck DeVore the more Conservative candidate in the race?

Moreover, can you explain Palin’s endorsement of Karen Handel, who was extremely soft on pro-life issues and had been paling around with the Log Cabin Sodomites, over the very conservative Nathan Deal (who ended up winning anyway.)

I think I know why she did it, but I’d be interested to hear your take on why she did it.


293 posted on 02/13/2011 9:24:35 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: freedomwarrior998
No, Palin was for Carly Fiorina because of pro-life, not electability. Electability is the establishment's mantra.

As far as Handel goes, I never heard of her. So who cares?

Cheers!

294 posted on 02/13/2011 9:59:33 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson