Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin is Running, and She’ll Get Creamed
The Constitution Club ^ | 02-12-11 | Dave the Sage

Posted on 02/12/2011 7:47:16 PM PST by TheConservativeCitizen

It does appear that former governor and GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah “you betcha” Palin will be throwing her beauty pageant sash into the presidential ring. She has added veteran Republican strategist Michael Glassner to serve as chief-of-staff for her political action committee, Sarah PAC, and steer her political operation. For the political insiders this is the strongest indication yet that Sarah Palin is seriously laying the groundwork for a serious bid for the white house. Unfortunately, she is probably the most disastrous of the current crop of possible GOP hopefuls and in my humble opinion would stand absolutely no chance in the general election. I will even venture to say that I don’t think she’ll make it out of the primaries. She is mistaking the general support the Right gives her as a person of character and cheerleader Tea Party as political support for a presidential bid. I submit to you the two are not the same and she will find this out the hard way. And if by some miracle she were to get the nod to lead the Republican party into the next general election we will witness a most embarrassing of electoral trouncings since Mondale got crushed by Reagan.

I defend Palin vigorously from the hatred and smears from the Left and admire her commitment to what is right and true. For the most part I share her politics, values, and ideology. And I think she makes a great fundraiser and cheerleader for the Right in general and the Tea Party in particular. But she had her chance for glory and success on the national stage and frankly blew it.

(Excerpt) Read more at constitutionclub.org ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: davesage4paultards; davethesage; davethesage4pds; elections; forrestgumpwrites; freepressforpalin; kneelbeforestsarah; obama; palin; palin2012; paultards; pimpmycrappyblog; potus; repomanwisdom; sarah10crapblog0; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-317 next last
To: TheConservativeCitizen; OldNewYork; MotherRedDog; sayuncledave; CatholicEagle; 0beron; cobyok; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


61 posted on 02/12/2011 8:11:36 PM PST by narses ( 'Prefer nothing to the love of Christ.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

BTW, I noticed that Dave praised Obama’s campaign skills. I wouldn’t vote for him or any other politician nominated by either political party. They’re all socialists for their favored constituents, mostly people who get their incomes either directly or indirectly from overspending, over-regulating government.


62 posted on 02/12/2011 8:12:33 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
why take her out of the race just because you think she will lose

Because it's backhanded - they don't want her in the race because she will win. This is a persuade others she'll lose, so don't bother. Let's see - how many of these hit pieces have we seen about Sarah? a couple daily for two years. And how many 'he'll get creamed' pieces on mitt, huck or newt? none. Get the picture? Propaganda works, that's why they use it but some clueless voters never learn - and they are the MSM's bait.
63 posted on 02/12/2011 8:13:04 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
Sarah will be president and what will the infidels think about that?

This proud Infidel likes the idea.

64 posted on 02/12/2011 8:13:37 PM PST by wastedyears (It has nothing to do with safety, and everything to do with control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Engineer_Soldier

“I agree with you. I like Palin, but she’s one example of the MSM being successful at ruining somebody. She stands absolutely zero chance at being elected by the general electorate.”

This is how I feel too. Palin would be a fine President, but she can’t be elected. The neo-Marxist media’s constant drumbeat of hatred against her has penetrated far too many weak minds. Her poll negatives are through the roof. If Palin does manage to be nominated, this will simple be a repeat of Sharron Angle, Ken Buck and Christine O’Donnell disasters, only at the national level.

The stakes are too high to go with someone that’s almost sure to lose. On the other hand, we do not want a RINO like Rommney. Personally, I think Michelle Bachmann would be a great President.

Also, I still think there’s some chance that Sarah Palin will run simply to act as a lightening rod for the negativity of the neo-Marxist press. After all, they can’t attack everyone all the time, so if they focus on Palin, it leaves Michelle Bachmann and others relatively unscathed in the public mind. I think Palin is both clever enough and patriotic enough to do this, particularly since I think she is smart enough to know she can not be elected.

I think there’s a possibility that Palin may be choosing to be the sacrificial lamb, and if this is the case, and the Pubs do take Prez, then you can bet Sarah Palin is going to be appointed to a primo cabinet post or better!


65 posted on 02/12/2011 8:13:40 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the right stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen
feh...
66 posted on 02/12/2011 8:13:58 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

Most disastrous of the current crop of possible GOP hopefuls?

Massachusetts RomenyCare Romney, hands down.

Divorced-his-cancer-wife/Scuzzafava-endorser Gingrich, close second.


67 posted on 02/12/2011 8:14:14 PM PST by flowerplough (Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer
she is but the latest example of the MSM ruining reputations

Very true and their malicious slanders will only grow worse if she actually announces. I think she's great but not yet Presidential material.

She has very strong appeal to conservatives but the rub is that independents decide elections, not conservatives. We have to win in 2012! Unless we field a candidate with strong crossover appeal (and elect a veto-proof majority in the Senate) the next 4 years under Dear Leader will give him plenty of time to pack the Supreme Court, appoint a host of new czars and turn the U.S. into a fascist/socialist dictatorship. I honestly don't think I'm exaggerating.

68 posted on 02/12/2011 8:14:25 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Big_Harry

Me, too!


69 posted on 02/12/2011 8:14:40 PM PST by Terry Mross (We need a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan; TheConservativeCitizen

And what was your point TheConservativeCitizen?

You angry because she’s prettier than you?

Why the heck did you stick your Troll neck out from under the bridge anyway?


70 posted on 02/12/2011 8:14:58 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: bcr100

Sounds like you have bought the BS from msm.Nobody buys their shit and you dont need to either.You’ve been here a couple of months.Try harder to be conservative will you?


71 posted on 02/12/2011 8:15:32 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Obviously self-appointed and self-annointed political genius

.


72 posted on 02/12/2011 8:16:10 PM PST by devolve (. . . . . . . . . . . . "- we*ll bring a gun!" . . "Fill your hand you skinny son of a bitch! . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE
"You mean the fudgePAC poll? Who cares these days? They have been infiltrated by the muzzis and the poofters."

Agreed, but the bipartisan political class does care and will run the show in each party. Maybe we can look forward to smaller government and opportunities for better leadership at every level after the defaults.


73 posted on 02/12/2011 8:16:39 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

and you think the media will not do the same to the next gop hopeful? you think they will allow mitt or Newt or christie to skate by without mudslinging and character destruction? If Palin withdrawls it means the media wins and will only redouble their attacks on the next person in line. It is why bush should have fought back.


74 posted on 02/12/2011 8:17:16 PM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
Also, I still think there’s some chance that Sarah Palin will run simply to act as a lightening rod for the negativity of the neo-Marxist press. After all, they can’t attack everyone all the time, so if they focus on Palin, it leaves Michelle Bachmann and others relatively unscathed in the public mind. I think Palin is both clever enough and patriotic enough to do this, particularly since I think she is smart enough to know she can not be elected. I think there’s a possibility that Palin may be choosing to be the sacrificial lamb, and if this is the case, and the Pubs do take Prez, then you can bet Sarah Palin is going to be appointed to a primo cabinet post or better!

What a disgusting bullshit idea.

75 posted on 02/12/2011 8:17:31 PM PST by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Conservatives need to find a candidate that actually has a reasonable shot at beating Obama. Handing him the white house in two years should not be an option.


76 posted on 02/12/2011 8:18:08 PM PST by TheConservativeCitizen (www.constitutionclub.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: devolve

I didn’t go to his site, but this thread is moving fast!! There are a number of similar threads tonight and many Ron Paul ones.


77 posted on 02/12/2011 8:18:34 PM PST by potlatch ( !/ ~*coincidences usually aren't *~\!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

and who will that be and will you abandon him/her as quickly as you wish to abandon Palin. you will run away from every conservative candidate when the media directs their fire at him/her. yellow.


78 posted on 02/12/2011 8:20:43 PM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

Read your history before posting gibberish. Republican candidates have been to the MSM “idiots” since at least Eisenhower.


79 posted on 02/12/2011 8:20:43 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

You mean the fudgePAC poll? Who cares these days? They have been infiltrated by the muzzis and the poofters.


80 posted on 02/12/2011 8:21:18 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-317 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson