Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: runninglips

One point that that doesn’t get much attention came to light in the LTC Lakin trial. Namely, the judge said the revelation of Obama’s BC’s would cause him “embarrassment”. What a bizarre comment for a judge to make. How on earth could a normal, legal and copacetic BC cause ‘Little Barry’ [to borrow his good friend Abercrombie’s nomenclature] the least ‘embarrassment’?

More to the point, if Obama needs to keep this type of secret(s) from those who pay his bills and finance his lavish lifestyle, to what length will he go to do it? What if, for example, Putin and/or Soros already know all about this ‘embarrassing’ fact (or facts)? Are one or both of them using the info to blackmail Obama? It is simply the case that most of what Obama has done has benefited foreign powers and hurt the US [witness his oil/drilling policy, for example]. Is he doing that just because he hates the US and wants to get even with us, or is someone pulling his strings?

When a POTUS is allowed and even encouraged to keep secrets—secrets it’s worth millions, at a minimum, to him to defend—it is entirely reasonable to speculate on who may already know about them, and to what use they are putting that knowledge.


107 posted on 01/13/2011 12:13:01 PM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter

One point that that doesn’t get much attention came to light in the LTC Lakin trial. Namely, the judge said the revelation of Obama’s BC’s would cause him “embarrassment”. What a bizarre comment for a judge to make. How on earth could a normal, legal and copacetic BC cause ‘Little Barry’ [to borrow his good friend Abercrombie’s nomenclature] the least ‘embarrassment’?

More to the point, if Obama needs to keep this type of secret(s) from those who pay his bills and finance his lavish lifestyle, to what length will he go to do it? What if, for example, Putin and/or Soros already know all about this ‘embarrassing’ fact (or facts)? Are one or both of them using the info to blackmail Obama? It is simply the case that most of what Obama has done has benefited foreign powers and hurt the US [witness his oil/drilling policy, for example]. Is he doing that just because he hates the US and wants to get even with us, or is someone pulling his strings?

When a POTUS is allowed and even encouraged to keep secrets—secrets it’s worth millions, at a minimum, to him to defend—it is entirely reasonable to speculate on who may already know about them, and to what use they are putting that knowledge.


Was Bill BJ Clinton blackmailed for his 50 ++ sex talk telephone calls to his girlfriend Monica Lewinsky, made always at 2 AM and always on unsecured non White House telephone lines,

easily intercepted by the Russians, or the Israelis, or others,

Probably.

Obama?

Don’t think he needs to be blackmailed.

He’s giving it all to the Russians as fast as he can with both hands.

Remember his “mentor’s” ode to STALIN ... ?

How many Presidents can boast of that, huh?


148 posted on 01/13/2011 12:44:39 PM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: Fantasywriter
The judge in the Lakin case did not say Obama’s BC would cause him embarrassment. That is yet again another birther falsehood. Judge Lind used the word ‘embarrass’ as a legal term of art meaning to not allow one branch of government to to infringe upon the Constitutional powers of another branch. I know this has been pointed out to you before but you keep up with this canard. I suggest you find a new talking point since even most of your birther buddies have stopped using this lie.
325 posted on 01/13/2011 6:29:44 PM PST by TNTNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson