[butterdezillion]

Also, TNTNT, it seems like you didn’t absorb what I wrote. The AG simply transmits the arguments and evidence to the court. The candidate’s lawyer can present whatever arguments he wants, with it being transmitted in writing through the AG. Same thing with the AG himself and anybody who cares to write an amicus briefs. If anything this allows MORE abversarial views to be presented because it leaves out all the procedural jackassery.

But you’re probably right. Without the potential for jackassery and obfuscation, none of the dems, reps, or Department of Injustice will like it. It serves the interests of the little people and justice too much, and that would never do.

They will snuff it out just like they snuff out every breath of fresh air that finds the tombs they intend to bury us all in.

[TNTNT]

Having the candidate who has been denied access to the ballot to have his arguments presented to the court by and through the attorney for the state that denied him access will not be allowed by any court in this country. That is without a doubt unconstitutional and a violation of due process.

FreeRepublic is very slow tonight, so I will get back with you tomorrow on your most recent proposal.