You realize you pinged two SP’s aka FINOs???
That creates a chain reaction!!!
They may have arguments similar to Eric Holder’s DOJ. Not in a million years could I think like Eric Holder, but in order to not overlook any argument Holder might make, I need the input of somebody who CAN think like him. I’d rather have those arguments pointed out now rather than after the time and money has been spent on trying to get something effective. If we can head off trouble, that’s what we need to do.
In that same vein, it would be helpful if people who are good at sarcasm brainstorm the silliest, most sarcastic arguments they can come up with, so the legal experts can see if there’s any argument we might be overlooking. This DOJ is capable of ANYTHING.
>You realize you pinged two SP’s aka FINOs???
>
>That creates a chain reaction!!!
Questions:
1) What do you mean by “SP’S”?
—I am assuming that you do not mean Shore Patrol, which as I understand is the Navy-equivalent of MP.
2) What is a FINO?
3) Considering that you said there were two of these, and there were only four in the ‘To’ field, the chance you are referring to me is .50; were you referring to me?