Posted on 12/26/2010 11:48:41 AM PST by American Dream 246
Edited on 12/26/2010 12:34:30 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
From Fox News Sunday
Williams: "There's nobody out there except for Sarah Palin who could absolutely dominate the stage and she can't stand on the intellectual stage with Obama"
Click on Fox News Sunday above for the video.
If you wish to see it starting just before Juan Williams' segment, click on the blog link.
“We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.”
Albert Einstein
With nuance like that Juan, you could probably get your NPR job back. /sarcasm
IDIOT
Obama’s “intellectual stage” is a lamestream media improvisation and Hollywood production.
Hey Juan.
Obama hasn’t demonstrated any “intellect”.
Well packaged lies are not a sign of “intellect”!
I just threw up my turkey dinner. What a crock. BHO is about as intellectual as my dog Buddy. Buddy has deeper thoughts about the philosphy of chasing cats than Bam Bam has on any issue.
Sarah Palin has something Obama was brought without. A moral Compass and she will be more than capable of debating a 2nd rate Commie wannabe on the issues of Democracy and the Capitalistic system.
Juan Williams, a monument to the quota system of Affirmative Action! Who give a rats a$$ about anything he has to say?
Juan Williams, a monument to the quota system of Affirmative Action! Who give a rats a$$ about anything he has to say?
"Forensic
Of, relating to, or used in public debate or argument"
But you knew that because you equated the word with "theatrics."
I said:
" ...they seek a president. That means they are judging the debaters on whether or not they can lead the country."
And then you replied:
" we make these things a bit too complicated. to hell with theatrics, who is going to lead this country through a very difficult decade ?"
I gather you agree with the message, you just react when it is applied to Sarah in any way that could be construed to be negative.
"Forensic
Of, relating to, or used in public debate or argument"
But you knew that because you equated the word with "theatrics."
I said:
" ...they seek a president. That means they are judging the debaters on whether or not they can lead the country."
And then you replied:
" we make these things a bit too complicated. to hell with theatrics, who is going to lead this country through a very difficult decade ?"
I gather you agree with the message, you just react when it is applied to Sarah in any way that could be construed to be negative.
Because that argument holds no water. Thats why I reject. Apparently there is a right way to talk, a right way to move and a right way to act. If this is such a cookie cutter business, there is no room for individuality is there ? If this is the case, no good real person is going to want to get involved in politics
The only addition I’d like to make to your on-target post is that addendum that if you’re attacking the GOP, you will be praised as a free-thinking politician regardless of the party with which you associate. We actually saw this with Palin when she took over as governor. The national media actually lauded her for her dedication in ending corruption (among the old GOP members) in AK. I remember one of the national news broadcasts even running the story of her selling the governor’s airplane on Ebay and the laurels they laid at her feet. As soon as she became an opponent of Zero, the knives were unsheathed.
Their first debate will be fun!
LMA0.......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.