"Forensic
Of, relating to, or used in public debate or argument"
But you knew that because you equated the word with "theatrics."
I said:
" ...they seek a president. That means they are judging the debaters on whether or not they can lead the country."
And then you replied:
" we make these things a bit too complicated. to hell with theatrics, who is going to lead this country through a very difficult decade ?"
I gather you agree with the message, you just react when it is applied to Sarah in any way that could be construed to be negative.
Because that argument holds no water. Thats why I reject. Apparently there is a right way to talk, a right way to move and a right way to act. If this is such a cookie cutter business, there is no room for individuality is there ? If this is the case, no good real person is going to want to get involved in politics