Skip to comments.
Cosmic Impact Site That Created Earth’s Axial Tilt and Fault Lines
Report and Opinion. 2010;2(2):1-2]. (ISSN: 1553-9873) ^
| Feb 2010
| Mihai Draghici
Posted on 12/08/2010 8:07:46 PM PST by mdraghici
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
1
posted on
12/08/2010 8:07:54 PM PST
by
mdraghici
To: mdraghici
The axial tilt was not caused by an impact. An impact could cause a wobble, but not a constant 23 degree tilt.
2
posted on
12/08/2010 8:14:25 PM PST
by
Christian Engineer Mass
(Leftys who zone in on Palin miss the point. America's not about single figures. That's for NK/Cuba.)
To: Christian Engineer Mass
Good thing then that our axis does wobble, it doesn't have a constant tilt. The
Chandler Wobble
3
posted on
12/08/2010 8:20:13 PM PST
by
mnehring
To: mdraghici; The Comedian
4
posted on
12/08/2010 8:22:26 PM PST
by
Whenifhow
To: mdraghici
" . . . in addition to changing Earths axial tiltWelcome to Free Republic.
I've been taught that since the Earth is an imperfectly balanced object, it "wobbles" like any other unbalanced spinning object. Wobbles like a top nearing the end of it's spinning. To finish a complete wobble circumference takes about 26,000 years so today's inclination (23.5 degrees) as to the sun will lessen and increase as this cycle progresses.
It is a large wobble. If one circumscribes in the sky via the axis into the heavens, the circle currently extends from near Polaris (today's pole star) to Vega (the pole star in 13,000 years).
To: Christian Engineer Mass
An impact that could cause a permanent tilt probably would have destroyed the Earth. Also, you’d clearly see a massive hole where the comet hit, and the spiderweb fractures that created the tectonic plates would decrease in size the further you get from the impact. Also, something that large traveling that fast would not have curved. It easily would have been a straight line carved out.
6
posted on
12/08/2010 8:23:31 PM PST
by
wastedyears
(It has nothing to do with safety, and everything to do with control.)
To: mnehring
It has a constant tilt of ~23degs sir, and a very slight wobble about that axis.
7
posted on
12/08/2010 8:24:34 PM PST
by
Christian Engineer Mass
(Leftys who zone in on Palin miss the point. America's not about single figures. That's for NK/Cuba.)
To: mdraghici
All this evidence puts into perspective the possibility of such a cosmic impact having occurred here on the planet Earth within recorded history and the existence of human kind.Probably when the expression "Crapped Pants" was invented.
8
posted on
12/08/2010 8:25:05 PM PST
by
The Cajun
To: Christian Engineer Mass
That “wobble” gives us our seasons.
9
posted on
12/08/2010 8:27:05 PM PST
by
Doomonyou
(Let them eat Lead.)
To: Christian Engineer Mass
The tilt changes between about 22 and 25 degrees on a cycle of about 41,000 years. The 23.5 degree number is the average that is the simplified version for children’s textbooks.
10
posted on
12/08/2010 8:28:01 PM PST
by
mnehring
To: Doomonyou
No, it's the constant axial tilt that gives us our seasons.
\ O \
<\pre>
Above: sun in middle, with axis of earth in January & July on either side
11
posted on
12/08/2010 8:28:56 PM PST
by
Christian Engineer Mass
(Leftys who zone in on Palin miss the point. America's not about single figures. That's for NK/Cuba.)
To: mnehring
~23.5 degrees is not just the average, it’s what it is now, and used for meaningful calculations. It’s not going to change any time soon.
12
posted on
12/08/2010 8:33:26 PM PST
by
Christian Engineer Mass
(Leftys who zone in on Palin miss the point. America's not about single figures. That's for NK/Cuba.)
To: Christian Engineer Mass
13
posted on
12/08/2010 8:36:14 PM PST
by
stormer
To: The Comedian
14
posted on
12/08/2010 8:44:19 PM PST
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: mdraghici
You guys are way beyond me; it is clear from my perspective, however, that earth has endured cataclysmic events which substantially altered the course of human events. Judgements, some would say.
Either we are random organisms adrift in the cosmos, or we aren’t.
Your call.
15
posted on
12/08/2010 8:44:46 PM PST
by
One Name
To: mdraghici
That sure does look like a sideways impact but the rest of it just sounds silly.
16
posted on
12/08/2010 8:47:57 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
To: One Name
Either we are random organisms adrift in the cosmos, or we arent.Your call.
Given my preference for the available evidence rather than what people would like to believe, it's pretty obviously "random organisms adrift in the cosmos."
To: arthurus
That sure does look like a sideways impact but the rest of it just sounds silly.
Psuedoscientific nonsense; site it comes from appears to be the "scientific journal" (please note I'm making air quotes with my fingers there) equivalent of the pay-to-publish book, with a bunch of random "papers" from Bangladeshis, Nigerians, etc.
To: The Cajun
Probably when the expression "Crapped Pants" was invented. Well, yes it would have been, if only pants had been invented by then.
19
posted on
12/08/2010 8:55:40 PM PST
by
Erasmus
(Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
To: Strategerist
Then, obviously, there is no such thing as right or wrong. “Values” are imagination.
Darwin was correct.
20
posted on
12/08/2010 8:56:07 PM PST
by
One Name
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson