.. Ulsterman’s musings and questions about the WH Insider.
Thanks, tut
Wonder if the Insider’s leaks are done.
I’m getting the feeling for the first time that
Ulsterman is also a Dem .. anyone else get that
impression from his writing on this?
And asking insider to respond... Very interesting. Looks like insider has gone to ground. The pieces on the chess board went in directions he didn’t expect! Lol it might be a while before he pops his head out of the gopher hole again.
There is something to the birther story. With these stories.... It’s gonna get more notice for sure now!
Nice work Ulsterman! That’s called yanking the chain! Keep it up! But not TOO hard, things tend to come crashing down on you when you do that.
Why does Ulsterman keep referring to “Insider” as “they”?
Fun fiction ...
No, I’m not buying it.
On second thought, it needs a barf alert.
My post is long so I’ll list summaries of the numbered paragraphs here and if any para looks skim-worthy, find the full text of the paragraph below the line:
1. Ulsterman carriers Dem water: What a surprise Obama is a failure!
2. I believe Ulsterman is the author of Insider leaks or works with a few others to compose this fiction
3. A few reason why I believe Insider leaks are compositions of rumors/reports from other sources
4. Ulsterman appears to provide ‘cover’ for his interview series.
Ok so if any thing looked worth skimming, find the paragraph number! :)
***************************************************
1. I believe that the overall spin coming from the Dems from now until forever is going to be that they were conned by Obama. They were not conned - they were the conners. I don’t believe anyone as mentally diminished, amoral, and inexperienced as Obama was back when he was being groomed for POTUS could not be recognized. The Dems knew and they didn’t care. The ends justify the means.So the Dems have lost national face for putting a psych-challenged empty suit in the office and they want to ‘choose again’. So Ulsterman carriers the water for the Dems talking ‘shock and awe’ about what a surprise Obama’s character was - well, Dems really should vet their candidates, no? He didn’t cleverly con them - they closed their eyes!
2. I believe that Ulsterman is the writer, at least in part, of these stories which he attributes to ‘Insider’. It reads like fiction composed of tidbits of information pulled together from chauffeurs, hairstylists etc.
Early on, another website which does interview actual WH insiders noted that sources are notoriously fearful of detection and may promise to leak information but never get up the nerve to do so, even over the course of several years etc. So the authors of that website were first to point out the fictional approach that Ulsterman seems to use and the unheard of access he has to the source who just talks and talks and talks.
3. I noticed that one Ulsterman ‘interview’ with the Insider took place for 2 hours in the Insider’s office. How likely is THAT? Yeah, real discrete. Ulsterman refers to receiving emails - again, how likely is it that someone who’s career (already at 30plus years) as a Dem operative would contact blog authors via email? And the breathless, dime store novel-type style reads like fiction. When readers pointed out these weaknesses, the next ‘leak’ was a post that had Insider stressing that HE gives information to Ulsterman in a dialogue that Micky Spillane would have deemed too stilted.
4. I also note that Ulsterman repeatedly tells us how to evaluate the Insider. Many times, I’ve read ‘well what Insider said happened so that proves he is ‘real’ etc.’ No - one could scoop up tidbits of WH gossip and fling ‘em to the the website in a fictionalized account and that wouldn’t make the source who or what Ulsterman says he is or make his amoral motives any more acceptable (Insider initially admitted he was ‘in it’ just to protect Dem pols who deserved better. When readers pointed out this amoral, unpatriotic stance, Insider suddenly went ‘rah rah’ for his country which, he said, he loves etc.)
Hasn’t everyone said that if Obama was going to go down over the birth certificate issue, it would be the dems that would do it when they wanted him out of office. Maybe this is just the beginning. Maybe the “they” really are multiple players in this situation, creating Ulsterman for this purpose. I think Rahm is involved. He gave Obama 2 years, now Obama wants to dis him in his bid for Mayor. If Obama is discredited, then his endorsements of any mayor candidate will also be discredited. Just my thoughts. It has been interesting reading though.
Not "debilitating to the nation" but the destruction of the Democrat party as we know it. A good thing since it is full of Communists.
This all reminds me of the Nigerian who had the supposedly explosive tape of MO, what was his name?
All fiction and wishful thinking, but a distraction.
No one is going to do the work for us, we have to do it ourselves.
The PUMAS, Hillbuzz and this guy are dems first and foremost and will support and protect the dem party ultimately,
proven again and again as we fall for this stuff only to be left empty handed.
Why was this published on Socyberty? All of The Insider series is there, I see. What was Newsflavor.com? Am I missing something?
bump
From the comments, re: the birth certificate
“The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed,
for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad.
The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies,but would be ashamed to tell big lies.” –Adolph Hitler
Hi, ulsterman. Enjoying your five minutes of fame? Ha!