Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Ulsterman Report: Reflections on the White House Insider (from Ulsterman)
SocyBerty ^ | 11-21-10 | Ulsterman

Posted on 11/21/2010 9:36:36 PM PST by STARWISE

Looking back on what was right, what was wrong, and where we may go from here…

Since our first interview titled “The President Is Losing It”, to the last interview, “He Ain’t No Democrat”, the tone of Insider has emerged as seemingly less calculated, more genuine, yet also more frantic to see some semblance of good come from all of this Insider “talk”. Whether or not that good will eventually result, remains to be seen.

I make no secret of my considerable dissatisfaction with the Obama White House, and the Democratic Party as a whole. That being said, I have known good Democrats, and far less than capable or honest Republicans. Insider on the other hand, while dismayed at the path his political party has taken in recent years, remains hopeful that same party will resolve itself to a far stronger and more unified future.

Their fear though, that the party may never recover from its grand folly of nominating, and then electing, Barack Obama as President of the United States, remains palpable. Insider blames no one more than themselves for that folly.

It is, as they have stated, the greatest mistake of their professional life. I wonder of the many millions who voted for Barack Obama, how many among them now share that same feeling of remorse that Insider so willingly admits to?

As with any anonymous source, there always remains – and rightfully so, the question of legitimacy of the information being disseminated. Is this real, or a figment of imagination?

The truth most likely resides somewhere in between – for Insider appears to say the most when speaking the least, and their intentions not always easily distinguished. A perfect example of this was Insider’s seemingly offhand comment at the end of a message where they briefly stated for me to watch for an upcoming media reports on Hillary Clinton being offered the position of Vice President in the Obama White House.

Such speculation was rampant in 2008, mentioned off and on in 2009, but was heard rarely in 2010. I payed it little mind, had almost forgot its mention in fact, until, just 48 hours after that interview was published, it was the leading story on both Fox and CNN, as well as making the front page of the Drudge Report and various other significant blog sites.

Insider’s before it broke call was… impressive. Impressive to have seen something so specific, be proven so accurate so quickly. Were they showing off just a bit? I do believe they were.

Then we have Insider’soft-repeated indications that the big money donors for the Democratic Party were considering pulling the plug on Obama.

*snip*

And what of the “certification file” allegedly mentioned by Nancy Pelosi?

Does such a file actually exist? Was it Pelosi’s knowledge of the certification process that has allowed her to ultimately remain in power despite overseeing historical losses against Democrats during the midterm elections?

Or does Pelosi have knowledge of something else? While Insider has repeatedly described any mention of Barack Obama’s eligibility status as “birther” nonsense, they have also initiated that subject themselves on occasion. Why?

If the issue is so silly, so beyond the realm of possibility, why bring it up at all? Perhaps as Insider has also hinted at, there does appear to be something there, but that something might prove so debilitating to the nation’s political process that it leaves Insider not wanting to play any part in such a damaging outcome?.

Of this I am certain – Insider knows far more on this subject than they have yet indicated.

Rest @ link


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Reference
KEYWORDS: demparty; obama; ulsterman; whitehouseinsider
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: ari-freedom

“it reminds me of American Spectator during the Clinton years”

I am not familiar with this - if you have time, would you elaborate? :)


21 posted on 11/22/2010 1:11:53 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I wondered that, too, then decided maybe it was a way to hide Insider’s gender (not indicate “he” or “she”).


22 posted on 11/22/2010 1:31:00 AM PST by fightinJAG (Step away from the toilet. Let the housing market flush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
If the issue is so silly, so beyond the realm of possibility, why bring it up at all? Perhaps as Insider has also hinted at, there does appear to be something there, but that something might prove so debilitating to the nation’s political process that it leaves Insider not wanting to play any part in such a damaging

Maybe they are bringing it up because it serves other purposes, such as keeping focus off some other issue or causing divisions in the Republican ranks. Many possibilities, if this is even a true interview series.

23 posted on 11/22/2010 1:35:09 AM PST by fightinJAG (Step away from the toilet. Let the housing market flush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Two possibilities, because defining gender of source could be used as a clue to identity or because Insider’s info was compiled from than one source but presented as if from only one.


24 posted on 11/22/2010 1:38:30 AM PST by kalee (The offences we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

“Well thought out .. still had enough seeming
previews of what was coming and did to keep me
wondering.”

I agree with you. Some things were accurate. I am not saying that none of it is real or that it is fictionalized without reference to actual rumors (gleaned either from other insider blogs or from people who work as chauffeurs, hairstylists, barbers etc. I think that there is some truth woven into the fictionalized account but I don’t know whether it is a regurgitation of rumors found elsewhere or from a composite of tips from people who work there etc.

What I do know is that from the earliest posts, Insider was saying he was leaking this information to help the ‘good people’ (he explained good people as Dems whose careers were being destroyed for having trusted and obeyed Obama, only to have Obama kick them to the curb). So my earliest questions was - well if Insider is real, how does leaking this information to the public ( and to the opposition) help Dems? I don’t want to help Dems. So if we react this way or that way to this information, how would it help Dems? Why do they need us at all?

My blind speculation was then that they wanted to stampede the general public or the opposition to ‘pull down Obama’ with ‘no confidence’ so the Dems wouldn’t get their hands dirty. I want them to get their hands dirty - this is their fault. If the Dems on the inside actually know zero is ‘on medication’ and irrational...well then...it is THEIR PATRIOT DUTY TO HANDLE, NOW! Don’t leak to us to get a good head of steam going that looks partisan or bipartisan!!!! If Obama is delusional/on drugs and Dems do nothing about it in order to ‘save face’ and protect the party, I consider that treason.

I didn’t like Insider’s stated motive and I still don’t even know what leaking this information does to help Dems - or was that part of the fiction?? Maybe Ulsterman just had a desire to be a ‘player’ believed to have highly placed connections but thought he needed to have an excuse for these leaks??. I dunno. But if Ulsterman was leaking information that was a threat to the WH, I believe someone WOULD check his email.

But Insider originally said he was leaking to help Dem careerists and that was my initial problem with him. In general - I didn’t like Insider because according to his own words, he was without morals, without patriotism and he wanted to use us (readers) by leaking this information. Hey what if everything Insider said was true? I still don’t want to help him help Dems ‘save face’ for trashing the country with this POTUS.

But then reading other blogs and their critiques on the Insider, some of the things that had been bothering me in the back of my mind leapt forward - Nixon’s ‘deep throat’ was high placed and look at how cautious he was (even before electronic saturation) but Ulsterman sat in Insider’s office for a 2 hour interview?? And yeah, the text and character of Insider do not seem like magazine interviews but more as drawn characters in a novel. Why even quote word for word instead of composing text if you needed to conceal identity? (PS: I notice today’s thread features Ulsterman using the same ‘good people’ syntax that Insider used before - coincidence?) The Insider has ‘talked’ so much, I believe his syntax would have been recognized because his ‘character’ is drawn into the interview. What highly placed dem operative would want verbatim quotes and why???

So I do still read the stuff (after reading some other critiques, I notice the fictional ‘style’ more) anyway because I am guessing that some of it may be based on rumors that might be true (yeah...I am pathetic!)- I just never know what is true, I have no idea how Ulsterman writes/acquires this text in order to leak it and, most of all, I don’t want the public to ‘react’ in a way useful to the Dems. I consider it a very weak source of rumor and yeah...I read it because there just COULD be something now and then that was at one time based on fact, maybe.


25 posted on 11/22/2010 1:43:05 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

I agree with you - there is too much variety, IMHO, to be the same person but I come down to the assumption that the purpose of this leaked material and possible sources are Clintonites.


26 posted on 11/22/2010 1:48:14 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey

Per my post #25, my bubble has been burst too. But I still read the stuff - but with a different angle now. Now I wonder ‘who wants what from whom’ when I read it and perhaps hope to catch sight of something that might be a rumor that turns out to be true.

I am guessing Clintonites benefit from this stuff. I dunno but real answers are on my Christmas list too!

And I suspect scandals are brewing but at the rate that he claims lawyers, AG’s are flooding to Chicago - I suspect that it’s an ‘open secret’ by now and that we’ll actually hear about it.


27 posted on 11/22/2010 1:58:27 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

This all reminds me of the Nigerian who had the supposedly explosive tape of MO, what was his name?

All fiction and wishful thinking, but a distraction.
No one is going to do the work for us, we have to do it ourselves.
The PUMAS, Hillbuzz and this guy are dems first and foremost and will support and protect the dem party ultimately,
proven again and again as we fall for this stuff only to be left empty handed.


28 posted on 11/22/2010 1:59:28 AM PST by kalee (The offences we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“I am not familiar with this - if you have time, would you elaborate? :)”

Once upon a time there was a scandal that went nowhere called Whitewatergate...


29 posted on 11/22/2010 3:49:45 AM PST by ari-freedom (Obama is now the Groper in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I’m confused. Is this a new account for Ulsterman? Has he been using Socyberry long? Why not Newsflavor? (both powered by Triond)


30 posted on 11/22/2010 4:25:03 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Why was this published on Socyberty? All of The Insider series is there, I see. What was Newsflavor.com? Am I missing something?


31 posted on 11/22/2010 4:40:14 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kalee

Well said and I agree.


32 posted on 11/22/2010 4:41:17 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

It is all strange.Ulster Man is a listed “Independent” on FB and actually expects us to believe he now thinks there is something to the BIRTHER issue because of people commenting to him on his FB page? These people commenting to him believe his rubbish, they believe when he went silent because Pelosi stayed on that he was having virus/computer issues. For the love of God there were people on UM’s FB page that thought something happened to him (because he went silent after a teaser) or that his silly FB page was taken over...


33 posted on 11/22/2010 4:47:19 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; 444Flyer; maggief; SunkenCiv; mojitojoe; Nachum

good democrat is an oxymoron.


34 posted on 11/22/2010 4:49:54 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer; maggief

The supposed insider’s FB page does not post this new article

http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/Ulsterman1?v=wall


35 posted on 11/22/2010 5:06:20 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

bump


36 posted on 11/22/2010 6:12:50 AM PST by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Nor does Newsfavor

http://newsflavor.com/


37 posted on 11/22/2010 6:50:14 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

I think we are dealing with a few hillbuzz Clinton lovers here.
Or DUmmies that have no life whatsoever.

I think that there is something TO all of it,Obama is a reckless and dangerous radical hell bent on power. But this is the Clinton’s wanting to fake a hail Mary to the center again.

It won’t work...

The Chicago mob scene of who is in the know who is ousted has been spilt into our government fully. This ticks me off beyond words. We have financial terrorism and radical factors running our government. Obama, Soro’s, Bloomberg, Feingold, Clinton’s; they are all the same. What do we have in place to stop this when the current DOJ is a political hack job aiding and abetting terrorists and the black Panthers, which is the supposed new ACORN?


38 posted on 11/22/2010 8:25:26 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; Protect the Bill of Rights

I have no clue ..


39 posted on 11/22/2010 8:35:26 AM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/rahm-emanuel-at-center-of-rift-with-white-house


40 posted on 11/22/2010 9:39:55 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson