Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Wizdum
If this is true it is time for the GOVERNORS of the border states to call out the guard for the border.

Then the state would be forced to pay for their deployment, and I expect there would be serious issues about what they would be authorized to do. Policing the border isn't a state duty, and the courts seems to be making it difficult for the States to choose to enforce Federal law if the Feds won't do it themselves.

11 posted on 11/18/2010 4:30:15 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: untrained skeptic
Then the state would be forced to pay for their deployment, and I expect there would be serious issues about what they would be authorized to do.

Policing the border isn't a state duty, and the courts seems to be making it difficult for the States to choose to enforce Federal law if the Feds won't do it themselves.

Yada, yada, yada...all wound up in complexity, while the invasion runs full speed ahead.

Comes a time when a people have to defend their land, no matter the artificial constraints and impediments forced upon them by a weak and treasonous government.

If the state fails their citizens by failing to protect them from invasion (as clearly demanded by the Constitution), should the people simply allow themselves to be destroyed, as a result?

I say, NO! Assign that government a condition of TREASON, and do whatever it takes to secure life, property, and liberty. Deal with the government traitors later.

26 posted on 11/18/2010 5:24:11 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson