Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Darkwolf377
My comment was not even about O'Donnell, it was a comment on how people don't like hearing facts that are inconvenient. He stated a fact, not a lie.

Right, it was and is a fact she took a long time to get a degree.

But -- if you have repeatedly stated that "DEGREES DON'T MATTER TO ME"TM -- then why are you praising a concern troll for pointing it out?

Since you state over and over it doesn't matter to you -- then why are you emphasizing it so much?

It's almost as though you are trying to seed talking points of discontent against COD with things that don't bother you at all ...!

After telling you I don't care about degrees, why are you saying I should identify with O'Donnell because she has a degree? Learn to read.

Take your own advice, son.

You even cut-and-pasted my text, and didn't get the point.

You quoted me as saying:

One would *think* you'd identify with her and admire her spunk and 'stick-to-it-iveness'.

It's the determination I thought you'd identify with, after your life story of out-hustling those with degrees.

Who knows, maybe there's a similarity to COD, who took 12 years to get a degree, out-working a Yale grad.

No. People like you, who freak out over simple facts.

I'm not freaking out: I'm playing with a troll.

If you could see me right now, you'd see my striped tail swishing from side to side (meow).

I don't identify with O'Donnell because I'm not a conservative who doesn't pay her bills and then lies about it.

Then concentrate on that up front, rather than attacking her degrees while insisting that they don't matter, mmmkay?

Makes you look less conniving and all...

I don't identify with O'Donnell because I've never claimed to be a conservative and then sued a conservative non-profit for $6.9 million over 'mental anguish'. (Oops, there's another fact--I'm a hater.)

Hmmm, *that's* a "tell". Conservatives don't use words like "hater" even in just: but it is stock-in-trade for the liberal and the troll.

Not being a Kennedy isn't enough. I don't care if O'Donnell or anyone else was born with nothing or was born with billions, character tells. Lying and suing for "mental anguish over being demoted because of my gender" is no different from anyone else who's trying to get a big payday they don't deserve--please tell me how that is being conservative? And then hiding behind the "I'm you!" crap--no, you're not me, I don't sue for millions over "mental anguish" when I dont' get a job.

No, you just go batshit crazy against a conservative who took out one of the handpicked RINOs and may be in a position to stop any shenanigans in the Lame Duck session, and who may give the majority in the Senate to the GOP.

While voting a consistent CONSERVATIVE line.

Fascinating that you would reject her.

How do you feel about Palin? Is she a whiner too?

What about Joe Miller in AK, Haley in SC, or Bialat in MA?

You watch too much Oprah. First you say I should identify with O'Donnell because she took a long time to get a degree, now you've switched to saying I'm attacking her because I want a degree.

No, I'm asking questions *of* you, rather than assume I know.

I haven't seen Oprah in maybe twenty years, when I was forced for social reasons to sit through an episode at a relative's house.

You really have to stop the silly TV psyche crap and simply READ--what part of "My multi-degreed boss regularly consults me" suggests I am somehow ashamed of my hard-won education?

The fact that you didn't lead off with it while commenting on COD's taking so long.

I wrote:

You mean like owning up to having dabbled with an Ouija board (which might discourage many of her Christian base)?

And you cut-and-pasted then replied:

When did I bring that up? What does that have to do with what I DID bring up--her inability to manage her finances while wanting to be in the body that controls our economy?

You didn't mention it directly, but you implied she wasn't forthright. I pointed out something embarrassing and potentially damaging which she *volunteered* out of the blue.

And the difference with Christine and Barney Frank is, Christine struggled, she didn't cheat and steal with other people's money, and then hide behind the press (and her own skirts,

So that $6.9 mil was her money?

No, but she didn't steal it, as is the case with the FannieMae/FreddieMac/etc. etc.

I guess you'll have your car fixed not by someone who does excellent work, but by someone who's caused someone's brakes to fail, because he's that much more sensitive to what happens when he screws up?

No, that'd be re-electing the Dems and the RINOs. Which -- by attacking COD, you are helping to do.

She's either a sensitive little girl who is being picked on, or worthy of being one of only 100 senators.

False dichotomy. She's worthy of being Senator based on her spunk, and her fairly winning the primary in the GOP.

And her conservative positions.

Your attempts to bring her down by praising criticisms of her, on items which you loudly announce you don't even care about, make you look like a troll.

As Bill Mauldin explained of his Willie & Joe cartoons in Stars and Stripes, "I build a shoe. If someone wants to put it on and loudly announce that it fits, that's their business."

Stop attacking conservatives on a conservative site, and you won't attract negative attention.

Save the cheers, just stop lying about me.

I'm not lying about you: but you were not forthright about your reasons for criticizing COD -- it took several back-and-forth posts and some poking you with a stick to get you to come out with them.

Cheers!

132 posted on 11/02/2010 12:58:11 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers
"It's fun to see you sputtering on angrily for paragraphs on end."

Your Stalin-esque tactic of repeating a lie enough times and praying it will then be accepted as the truth (keep saying it over and over that the SINGLE LINE you've expended ALL of this type over was an attack on O'Donnell for not having a degree, tabby!) when you so obviously have to keep up with your Oprah psychology just so you won't have to admit you had no idea what you were talking about/

Keep whining about "trolls" when you've spent paragraph after paragraph, frustrated because I refuse to buy into the cult of personality and unquestionably fall in line behind someone who poses but doesn't walk the walk. I live my values, dude--I don't shriek hysterically over ONE SENTENCE in praise of that most horrible thing for phonies--facts.

It's fun to see you sputtering on angrily for paragraphs on end.

You keep right on with your frustration over FACTS, tabby--it's funny watching you squirm in frustration over a ball of string, when some of us demand all who wish to take control of this greatest country are merely honest and competent, and aren't fooled by labels and spin.

It's fun to see you sputtering on angrily for paragraphs on end.

Oprah-trained physician, heal thyself! LOL! :)

134 posted on 11/02/2010 3:57:45 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 ( Mm, your tears are so yummy and sweet!Oh, the tears of unfathomable sadness! Mm-yummy! --E. Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson