OMG - they *are* involved! Of course, we already knew this, by Dan’s own account.
I’m going to go out on a limb and say the real impetus wasn’t the possibility of a lawsuit but the certain loss of political advertising dollars. Does Dan Fagan bring in more revenue than the loss of that woman’s (I refuse to say her name) tainted money? The math may have looked bad. It’s still an abuse of power that is almost murcowsky-like....oh, wait. *rolleyes*
You have to see this.
Here is the list
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2617466/posts#comment