50-60 in House, probably
To: therightliveswithus
2 posted on
10/27/2010 3:39:45 PM PDT by
evad
(SHUT IT DOWN!!!)
To: therightliveswithus
> 70 in the House.
> 8 in the Senate.
3 posted on
10/27/2010 3:41:51 PM PDT by
dartuser
("The difference between genius and stupidity is genius has limits.")
To: therightliveswithus
According to the MSM, it will be a majority, but far, far short of expectations and it means that it really wasn’t a referendum on Obama, just voter angst over what that effing Bush and his oil buddies did to screw us all over.......
4 posted on
10/27/2010 3:44:37 PM PDT by
Gaffer
To: therightliveswithus
6 posted on
10/27/2010 3:53:46 PM PDT by
MIchaelTArchangel
(Obama makes me miss Jimmah Cahtah!)
To: therightliveswithus
I’ll risk saying 70 in the House and 9 in the Senate, but I think it might be even better.
7 posted on
10/27/2010 4:13:07 PM PDT by
pallis
To: therightliveswithus
I don’t know enough about ALL the individual races, but it will be more historic than 1994, where we picked up 52 seats.
To: therightliveswithus
50-60 in House, probablyWith voter fraud, I'd have to say you're right.
11 posted on
10/27/2010 4:42:21 PM PDT by
mrreaganaut
(Oderint dum metuant: "Let them hate so long as they fear" - Lucius Accius)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson