Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

There is no flip flop. They should not serve secretly.

As far as openly - they should be evaluated like everybody else - they probably will be found not able to serve by the psychologists - application denied - problem solved


34 posted on 10/21/2010 12:47:48 PM PDT by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Big Bureaucracy

If a man and a woman are both serving, right now they have to keep their love relationship secret. Should that also be public?

There will be a breakdown in order and focus.

There are a lot more gay journalists crying for this than heterosexual (or even adulterous) journalists.


36 posted on 10/21/2010 12:50:00 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Big Bureaucracy; manc; scripter; a fool in paradise; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; xzins; ...
There is no flip flop. They should not serve secretly.

This is what you wrote in post #22:

Homosexuals should be evaluated like everybody else - they apply honestly if found able to serve - they serve - if found not able - not serve.

Now you sound like John Kerry, you were for them serving before you were against them serving.

As far as openly - they should be evaluated like everybody else - they probably will be found not able to serve by the psychologists - application denied - problem solved

First of all, to the best of my knowledge, there is not any sort of intensive psychological exam required to enlist.

Secondly, relying on psychologists to get anything right (military or not) is typically a bad idea.

Once again, why won't you just answer my original question with a yes or no answer. Tell me what YOU think, not what you assume a psycholigist might say:

Do YOU think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Military? YES or NO

41 posted on 10/21/2010 1:00:19 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson