[wagglebee]

There is no flip flop. They should not serve secretly.

This is what you wrote in post #22:

Homosexuals should be evaluated like everybody else - they apply honestly if found able to serve - they serve - if found not able - not serve.

Now you sound like John Kerry, you were for them serving before you were against them serving.

As far as openly - they should be evaluated like everybody else - they probably will be found not able to serve by the psychologists - application denied - problem solved

First of all, to the best of my knowledge, there is not any sort of intensive psychological exam required to enlist.

Secondly, relying on psychologists to get anything right (military or not) is typically a bad idea.

Once again, why won't you just answer my original question with a yes or no answer. Tell me what YOU think, not what you assume a psycholigist might say:

Do YOU think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Military? YES or NO

[Big Bureaucracy]

‘tell me what YOU think, not what you assume a psycholigist might say’

I am against them serving secretly.
I respect everybody who is able and willing to serve.
There may be one person with two artificial legs who is able and willing to serve - he/she should serve.
I am nobody to say who is able and who is not - individuals should be evaluated individually.