Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Big Bureaucracy; manc; scripter; a fool in paradise; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; xzins; ...
I have no problem if what you say is the official policy,

You should be working for Myth Romney because that's who you sound like.

Here is what you wrote in post #22:

Homosexuals should be evaluated like everybody else - they apply honestly if found able to serve - they serve - if found not able - not serve.

Now you come back with a flip-flop answer. Why don't you quit trying to figure out the answer that I want to hear and tell me what YOU think:

Do YOU think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Military? YES or NO (I'll give you a hint, conservatives seldom have problems with yes or no questions.)

30 posted on 10/21/2010 12:40:50 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

"They see me trollin', they hatin'"

32 posted on 10/21/2010 12:45:04 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

There is no flip flop. They should not serve secretly.

As far as openly - they should be evaluated like everybody else - they probably will be found not able to serve by the psychologists - application denied - problem solved


34 posted on 10/21/2010 12:47:48 PM PDT by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson