[Big Bureaucracy]

‘There is no shortage of people who can serve and serve well, there is NO REASON to allow those who destroy the morale of the men and women who are in harm’s way.’

I have no problem if what you say is the official policy, however DADT is like closing eyes and allowing them to serve - this is why the policy is wrong.

If they are not able - they shouldn’t be allowed in.

[wagglebee]

I have no problem if what you say is the official policy,

You should be working for Myth Romney because that's who you sound like.

Here is what you wrote in post #22:

Homosexuals should be evaluated like everybody else - they apply honestly if found able to serve - they serve - if found not able - not serve.

Now you come back with a flip-flop answer. Why don't you quit trying to figure out the answer that I want to hear and tell me what YOU think:

Do YOU think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Military? YES or NO (I'll give you a hint, conservatives seldom have problems with yes or no questions.)