Posted on 10/15/2010 5:58:58 AM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
Well, we got smacked by the modnim adderater. I guess we just have to put Mostly Vulgar on “ignore” and carry on regardless. This is a fun thread in spite of the FReepers who don’t understand our point.
We are all humblegunner. ;-)
Ever wise, our moderating team.
Further, if everyone who objects to blog pimping is engaged
on THIS thread, shouldn't that be a good thing for those who
pimp blogs? The-cat's-away and all that? ;-)
MOM JUST SAID WE CAN HAVE A PARTY WITH NO RULES!!!
(At least that's what it sounded like.)
But they OMIT the information most times.
"I found a video, look at my blog!"
"I re-wrote an article, look at my blog!"
You'll note hardly anyone objects to the full content being posted.
I probably needn't show you examples.
I predict this will become one the historic threads on FR!
Is that a host in the sun?
I just saw a host in the sun!
Gee, no kidding? I didn't say it is. It is considered a blog by some though.
Your allocation of the team blogpimp has been misapplied many times.
Then you and others hijacked the threads.
Oh, and none of my facts were crooked. Re read if you want to verify.
Just by the way..
Syncro is alright.
He just has a different opinion, that’s all.
Trust me. I’m a jam-up judge of these things. ;-)
Would you, could you, on a thread?
Fine when that is what it is
But many bloggers threads were hijacked that were posted properly.
So they are all blog pimps to you?
Then ask to have the forum removed.
I'm sure the management would appreciate your request
I and at least most of what I see of this anti-blogpimping “team” are not attacking blogs in general, but the use of FreeRepublic to promote their blog.
I see FR as the way to get the conservative word out. Excerpting needlessly puts blog hits of the conservative message and associated activism.
:)
You misunderstood. I was saying the ones that get hijacked are usually the ones by the pimps... ;) The other bloggers are ok.
Please visit:
Ah, good times.
Would you, could you, on the ‘net?
Would you, could you, were you wet?
I would not, could not, not on a bet!
Did you know?
Bennett Cerf, Dr. Seuss’ editor, bet him that he couldn’t write a book using 50 words or less. “The Cat in the Hat” was pretty simple, after all, and it used 225 words. Not one to back down from a challenge, Mr. Geisel started writing and came up with “Green Eggs and Ham” — which uses exactly 50 words.
The 50 words, by the way, are: a, am, and, anywhere, are, be, boat, box, car, could, dark, do, eat, eggs, fox, goat, good, green, ham, here, house, I, if, in, let, like, may, me, mouse, not, on, or, rain, Sam, say, see, so, thank, that, the, them, there, they, train, tree, try, will, with, would, you.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/wayoflife/01/23/mf.seuss.stories.behind/index.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.