Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump on Fox & Friends: "Seriously Considering" Run for President as a Republican - Video
Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | October 5, 2010 | Brian

Posted on 10/05/2010 6:27:42 AM PDT by Federalist Patriot

Here is video from Fox & Friends where Donald Trump was interviewed this morning, and he confirmed he is “seriously considering” a run for President in 2012. Trump said if he decides to run, he will run “as a Republican” – “I’m a Republican.”

Trump said if the U.S. continues on the current course, we will not be a great country 10 years from now.

Trump: “I’m totally being serious because I can’t stand what’s happening to the country.”

Wow. That would certainly shake up the GOP Nomination race.

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.net ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: donaldtrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Federalist Patriot

Just what we need, another arrogant, egotistical, narcissist in the WH.


21 posted on 10/05/2010 6:43:12 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
While I certainly don't have respect for all the politicians, characters and goings-on in our nation's political system, I DO have respect for the system itself as established by the founders.

I have ZERO respect for monied clowns like Trump using and making a mockery of the system. He is actually a mentally-warped man using his wealth for self-promotion and stoking his insecurities.

Even his looks are unsettling and he creeps me out in a big way.

He adds nothing of real substance to our American political system, only moronic distraction, clownishness and show biz antics.

Leni

22 posted on 10/05/2010 6:51:06 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Are any Americans better off than they were 4 trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WAW; miss marmelstein

“Amen. Run for mayor and give Bloomberg a run for all of his money.”

That would be good. He will have a lot of appeal locally, I would think. Nationally he would probably be about where Giuliani was.

However, if Romney gets the GOP nomination through some fluke similar to ‘08, I would vote for Trump in a heartbeat as a third party candidate. Either DT or BO would win with about 36% of the vote. With his racist base, it would probably be BO, alas.


23 posted on 10/05/2010 6:53:50 AM PDT by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
He ain't got my vote.

And I don't give a flying fig if that means a not-vote for Trump means a vote for Ubama.

24 posted on 10/05/2010 6:55:33 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

He’d probably make a good mayor - and as you say - he’d have the same problems with the Republican base that Guiliani had.


25 posted on 10/05/2010 6:55:57 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

Its not like ethics will be a stumbling block for him.


26 posted on 10/05/2010 6:56:09 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

“I have ZERO respect for monied clowns like Trump using and making a mockery of the system. He is actually a mentally-warped man using his wealth for self-promotion and stoking his insecurities.”

I don’t see how this would make him any different from at least 97% of elected federal officials. I am quite serious. I think most of Congress would not be able to meet the psych eval requirements for a middling police department.

I am not disagreeing with your statement, I just don’t see how this would make Trump one whit worse than the majority of politicians who presently abuse and oppress the people.


27 posted on 10/05/2010 7:00:41 AM PDT by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

At LEAST lose the combover 1st-!!!


28 posted on 10/05/2010 7:01:32 AM PDT by imjimbo (The constitution SHOULD be our "gun permit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Its not like ethics will be a stumbling block for him.”

Lol, with Obama, the ethics bar has not been lowered so much as it has been tossed over the side and into the abyss.


29 posted on 10/05/2010 7:04:47 AM PDT by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Hell just run mccain again... I could not stand mr comb-over any more than I can stand obama.

LLS


30 posted on 10/05/2010 7:05:34 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Washington could use some good “You’re Fired!”’s.

But I don’t see Trump as a conservative.
He run’s casinos.
He’s operated most of his life leveraged to the hilt.


31 posted on 10/05/2010 7:10:37 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Now if Wynn gets in too, that will be worth watching !


32 posted on 10/05/2010 7:22:47 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
I''m not disagreeing with your evaluation either. However, no matter how rotten, egotistical or oppressive many of our politicians are, we have to continue to weed them out whenever and however it's within our abilities to do so.

Weeding out self-promoting jerks like Trump who love to wield power through money would be a good start in vetting presidential election wannabees.

The Donald's gambling interests, history of bankruptcies and bad debts, extravagant life-style, extramarital affairs, messy divorces, hucksterism and lust for self-promoting show biz appears to put him in the same category you rail against....and he appears to be just the type of political aspirer we DO have the power to weed out.

Unless we are fascinated by him, that is......

Leni

33 posted on 10/05/2010 7:28:01 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Are any Americans better off than they were 4 trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Aria

Not to mention the first daughter.


34 posted on 10/05/2010 7:29:07 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

The showboating is a particular weak point, as it is distracting and indicates rather shallow obsessions. I would much prefer a cold blooded, calculating, low profile executive in the Cardinal Richelieu tradition. Cheney is a good example of the type. Putin is is an interesting hybrid of the two styles of showboat and Machiavellian.

Given that our populace demands entertainment in exchange for votes, hybrids may be the best option until there is a cultural change. Economic blight may prove to be a sobering effect in the not too distant future, but we are not there yet.


35 posted on 10/05/2010 7:43:30 AM PDT by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

The only Trump I would vote for is Ivanka. LOL!


36 posted on 10/05/2010 7:48:07 AM PDT by BossLady (Obama ----> Insane in the Membrane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

I can’t trust anyone how hasn’t had a drink or a smoke./s


37 posted on 10/05/2010 7:54:23 AM PDT by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Hey Don, how about running for Mayor of NY city first; then maybe run for Governor of NY. Prove you can handle either of those jobs first. Our current experience is pretty good evidence that President isn’t really a good entry-level position. Enough resume checking. One thing that the election of Barack Hussein Obama has taught us once and for all is "it's the ideology, stupid." A president surrounds himself with the functionaries he needs to pull the strings. As much as a disaster as the Obama presidency has been from out perspective, if you're a socialist things are looking pretty good. They may not be moving fast enough for your taste but Obama has put into place in the bureaucracy much of the machinery he will need to drag America to socialism long after he has left office. From that perspective - the leftist perspective - he's done a good job.
38 posted on 10/05/2010 8:14:42 AM PDT by Yet_Again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
NO THANKS:

Dems and Reps are both wrong on guns

It’s often argued that the American murder rate is high because guns are more available here than in other countries. Democrats want to confiscate all guns, which is a dumb idea because only the law-abiding citizens would turn in their guns and the bad guys would be the only ones left armed. The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 Jul 2, 2000

APPROVES assault weapon ban, waiting period, & background check

I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.

Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102 Jul 2, 2000

39 posted on 10/05/2010 9:15:21 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (There is no "common good" which minimizes or sacrifices the individual. --Walter Scott Hudson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
And again no thanks, this time on taxing the so-called "rich":

One-time 14.25% tax on wealth, to erase national debt Trump wants to soak the rich, including himself. He proposed a 14.25% tax yesterday on the net worth of wealthy Americans.

He said the one-time tax package would:
* Raise $5.7 trillion to erase the nation’s debt and save $200 billion in annual interest payments
* Use the savings to save Social Security and slash taxes for the middle class
* Increase his personal tax bill by at least $725 million.

Source: Boston Globe, p. A19 Nov 10, 1999

40 posted on 10/05/2010 9:21:54 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (There is no "common good" which minimizes or sacrifices the individual. --Walter Scott Hudson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson