Using divisive tactics pitting one sector of conservatives against other sectors of conservatives is what liberal plants always try to do. You aren’t one of those are you?
Would you be willing to name one elected lds that is conservative?
HA!
YOU are a liberal!!
—MormonDude(DEFEND yourself; hateful bigot!!!)
As stated before...if people who are conservatives are just that then they don't need to borrow statements, as you made above, which the liberals use to support their agendas. At least quote conservative arguements....I've seen too many using liberal pointers and phrases on this thread....the above is one of them.
As stated before...if people who are conservatives are just that then they don't need to borrow statements, as you made above, which the liberals use to support their agendas. At least quote conservative arguements....I've seen too many using liberal pointers and phrases on this thread....the above is one of them.
Suppose CB that you worked for a company whose boss said
...every other company is his industry was 100% "corrupt" -- including all employees...
...had 100% wrong (abominable) policies,
and that no employee should join ANY of them.
(And, oh, BTW, he also claimed all such fellow-industry employees had apostatized from any legitimate means to continue operating...that they really had no "license" to operate)
So, CB, if you NEVER openly disagreed with these statements by your boss, what? You don't think his statements should cast any shadow on you when you defend such a boss?
(That in a nutshell, is what Beck's boss-prophets have been saying for 180 years...nothing Beck has openly disagreed with)
And yet somehow you don't see what Mormon leaders have done as being "divisive" to the religious community.
Furthermore, in this way, Beck matches Romney in failing to pass the leadership test:
'Cause if I...
..(a) was from a commonly regarded "cultic group"; and
...(b) proceeded to mislabel 75% of my base support's primary faith tenets & claims as mere "apostate" status (Note: 75% of people claim to be "Christians" in the more mainline/Protestant/Catholic sense--& frankly, this % is higher in the Republican party & among conservatives)
Then...
Conclusion: I not only show open disdain for my base, but betray my ability to inspire confidence in my ability to accurately define a major world religion. If I cannot accurately define a major world religion, what confidence do I inspire re: my ability to handle national security issues, terrorist issues, & negotiation issues pertaining to another world religion like Islam? (Besides, how are LDS who in print openly label all Christians as “apostates” any different than Muslims who in print openly label all Christians as “infidels?”)