Questions Persist on O’Donnell’s Resume

Wall Street Journal ^ | 09-30-2010 | Danny Yadron

[freedomwarrior998]

For the record, Delaware Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell did not take classes at England’s Oxford University. But the tea party-backed Republican, who has hit snag after snag since defeating Rep. Mike Castle in this month’s GOP primary, faced questions for the third consecutive day about her education credentials posted on Internet resume sites.

[muawiyah]

You are easily misled by propaganda and adroit editing. Would you like to buy a bridge ~ I presently have title to a couple of big ones near Annapolis.

[stormer]

I happen to enjoy hearing someone tell the truth.

[ansel12]

That supports what I said, a big liberal.

You are anti social-conservative and fully for the Gay power agenda (and not afraid to push it here), adoption, marriage, the whole bit.

There was no way that you would support Christine O’Donnell and her “homophobia” as you like to pin on conservatives.

[Moorings]

Please do post all the lies that came out of that “pie-hole”

[muawiyah]

I'll dispense with the learned lecture, but there is NO CENTER IN AMERICAN POLITICS.

Everything coalesces around two poles ~ Republican and Democrat.

It's in the nature of the logistics of winning elections in single member districts.

It's called a BI MODAL SADDLE.

You are wasting your time looking for a middle when all there is outside the two big coalition groups is a "fringe"

[Cringing Negativism Network]

I enjoy winning.

How about we focus on that part?

[presently no screen name]

not a flake

Enough said. It's the old 'keep them talking....'

Conservatives will support who THEY want to support - so save your dribble and wipe your chin.

[cammie]

So WHAT YOU THINK doesn't matter on this CONSERVATIVE site. Lately, what anyone thinks who does not march in lockstep to one very specific brand of conservatism doesn't matter much on this site. It's a shame that we've lost most of our interesting intellectual debate as the libertarians and more moderate Republicans have been scared away. One hopes that they are not scared away from voting their principles as well. But if you saw my response to 84, that allegation in 84 was a very skewed read of my posting history here. I'm not sure how someone who voted straight pro-life until that party lost the ballot in my state is anti social conservative, but, hey, have it your way.

[bigdaddy45]

Did you buy them from COD?? She seems to be selling them by the bushel.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Maybe you should spend more time explaining what conservatism is to you, and less time attacking conservative candidates.

That would be a win-win.

All of us interested readers can learn more about you, and you’d stop sabotaging our candidates.

How about it?

[muawiyah]

That's the second gerbil picture hider on this one thread. Those bad boys are sure working overtime to inferentially support Coons.

I swear, they know some truths about their boy ~ or they wouldn't be here.

The internet pictures don't lie (when they're taken out to hide the truth), but they sure reveal proclivities.

[cookcounty]

Meanwhile, we find that Mr. Coons, while at Yale Divinity School took a course, Religion 717, titled Witches and Witch Hunting!!!!!!

You can't make this stuff up!

(reference American Spectator)

[cammie]

Yep, that’s right, just becuase I don’t support every plank in the social conservative platform, I MUST be a big liberal. Because, God knows, there’s no room for differing opinons or nuance or independent thinking or any of those things THAT USED TO SEPARATE US FROM THE LEFT.

[presently no screen name]

one very specific brand of conservatism doesn't matter much on this site.

Save your talking points - they DON'T work here. Get lost!

[muawiyah]

Nobody believes you when you make that claim.

[bigdaddy45]

Yes, conservatives will support who THEY want to support. And sometimes (rarely, but sometimes) they decide to support a flake. It happens. Happens WAY more on the Democrat side (see 90% of the CBC), but every now and then one sneaks by on our side too.

Doesn’t mean I stand up and cheer. But if you want to get the pom poms out and lead the chant, have at it.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Interesting choice of words to describe conservatives:

“They”.

[Moorings]

we've lost most of our interesting intellectual debate

I believe it is the owner of this site who likes to remind everyone that Freerepublic is not a liberal debate forum.

Are we conservatives not intelligent enough for you?

[ansel12]

Considering how strong freerepublic is in fighting the gay power agenda, it is pretty unusual to find such a strong advocate of the homosexual agenda here.

[muawiyah]

Cammie, come off it. Everybody knows where you stand on everything. The primary is over ~

We love the woman ~ warts and all. You don't like girls anyway.

See the difference?

Now, go home before you get arrested standing around without your britches.