Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: presently no screen name
So WHAT YOU THINK doesn't matter on this CONSERVATIVE site. Lately, what anyone thinks who does not march in lockstep to one very specific brand of conservatism doesn't matter much on this site. It's a shame that we've lost most of our interesting intellectual debate as the libertarians and more moderate Republicans have been scared away. One hopes that they are not scared away from voting their principles as well. But if you saw my response to 84, that allegation in 84 was a very skewed read of my posting history here. I'm not sure how someone who voted straight pro-life until that party lost the ballot in my state is anti social conservative, but, hey, have it your way.
108 posted on 09/30/2010 8:36:08 PM PDT by cammie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: cammie

Maybe you should spend more time explaining what conservatism is to you, and less time attacking conservative candidates.

That would be a win-win.

All of us interested readers can learn more about you, and you’d stop sabotaging our candidates.

How about it?


110 posted on 09/30/2010 8:37:58 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (GOP establishment are dinosaurs. Tea Party is a great big asteroid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: cammie
one very specific brand of conservatism doesn't matter much on this site.

Save your talking points - they DON'T work here. Get lost!
114 posted on 09/30/2010 8:39:56 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: cammie
we've lost most of our interesting intellectual debate

I believe it is the owner of this site who likes to remind everyone that Freerepublic is not a liberal debate forum.

Are we conservatives not intelligent enough for you?

118 posted on 09/30/2010 8:42:30 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: cammie; presently no screen name
But if you saw my response to 84, that allegation in 84 was a very skewed read of my posting history here. I'm not sure how someone who voted straight pro-life until that party lost the ballot in my state is anti social conservative, but, hey, have it your way.

No wonder you didn't ping me while dismissing my post, you were telling a tall tale.

You are solidly behind the Gay power agenda, that is anti-social conservative, pushing for homosexual adoption and "marriage"? That is solidly anti-conservative, and there is no way that you could accept O'Donnell.

129 posted on 09/30/2010 8:54:47 PM PDT by ansel12 ([fear of Islam.] Once you are paralyzed by fear of Mohammedanism...you have lost the battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson