Surrender - 9/11/2010

Personal Blog - TwoConservatives ^ | 9/11/2010 | Charles Reichley

[CharlesWayneCT]

9/11/2010. This is the day that our government surrendered to the radical Muslim hoardes.

Those radical muslims threatened our armed forces, if we are to believe General Petraeus.

In response, the President of the United States, the Secretary of Defense, the FBI (3 times), and General Petraeus all responded to the threat against our troops -- by actively and publicly intervening to stop the exercise of free speech (as defined by the Supreme Court) that was objected to by those who threatened us with war.

In response to the overwhelming force of government threats and intimidation, the citizen of our country backed down, and agreed to relinquish his freedom to make his statement.

This is the very definition of surrender -- the Commander in Chief (as Obama referred to himself when harassing a citizen for threatening to commit free speech), rather than standing up for the rights of our citizens guaranteed in the constitution, surrendered to those threatening war. Without a shot being fired, the muslim extremists who threatened our troops won the war.

The only question that remains is, are there any rights that our President, and his leadership team, are willing to defend against threats of violence? Well, we know that Obama refuses to stand up to the threat of violence from Mexico that would result from enforcing our immigration laws and stopping the illegal invasion of our country from the south.

So, what is next? Suppose the muslim extremists threaten violence if we don't make some muslim holy day a national holiday? What if they insist we allow muslim communities to practice sharia law? If they object to women wearing provocative garments when walking near mosques or during holy days?

What if they insist we don't prosecute the increasing acts of violence muslims are inflicting on their own families in the name of "honor killings"? Is there some point at which the Obama administration will draw the line and say "enough is enough -- we don't mind surrendering SOME of our rights to extremists, but not the rights that WE care about!!!!".

There are many forms of free speech that are highly controversial. Thus, the provocative statement "I may object to what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" -- a cornerstone of our freedom in this country. Obama's administration has replaced this with "If I object to what you have to say, I won't lift a finger to defend your right to say it".

Here, on the 9th aniversaray of 9/11, we have time to reflect on the war that the extremists launched on our way of life long ago, and the most bruttle battle in that war, the downing of the two towers and the smashing of the Pentagon. We rebuilt the Pentagon, but in our first show of weakness have failed to rebuild the towers, which is a constant source of delight to the extremists -- no matter how much we weaken them on the battlefield, they can look to Ground Zero and know they have mortally wounded us; this is why so many Americans dislike the idea of building a victory mosque so close to that site.

So it is sad that, on this aniversary, we are dealt such a blow, the surrender of our freedoms to these extremists. You don't negotiate with terrorists. You don't surrender your freedoms for the vain hope of security. If General Petraeus can't defend our troops against the mongrel extremist hordes, if the placement of our troops in Afghanistan results in the surrender of our free-speech rights at home, it is time for new leadership, a leadership that understands that the military exists to defend our freedoms, not so we have to surrender our freedoms to protect the military.

[mkjessup]

I'll match that bet and call.

LOL, you obviously have the high (graphic) cards FRiend, I fold! ;)

[Responsibility2nd]

So, what is next? Suppose the muslim extremists threaten violence if we don't make some muslim holy day a national holiday? What if they insist we allow muslim communities to practice sharia law? If they object to women wearing provocative garments when walking near mosques or during holy days?

______________________________________________________

So, what is next? Good question. I'd say we be on the lookout for laws (state and federal) giving Islam the same special and protected rights that gays have.

I'd say we should expect black robed thuggery from our Courts punishing churches, businesses and even individuals who voice an opinion against Islam.

So, what is next? I'd say stock up on Vaseline. Cause we're gonna need it to accommodate the insanity that is being shoved in our shorts.

[The Comedian]

Unfortunately, with the Islamic-sympathizing Pretenda from Kenya stinkin’ up the Oval Office, that isn’t going to happen until Jesus comes back.

And when He does, He is going to be kicking ass, and taking names. I always hope I might be found worthy, but if not?

I still pray for Him to return as His Word promises, just so I can witness the mass destruction and desolation that all of the adherents of the so-called ‘religion of peace’ will experience as they watch the King of kings and Lord of lords put mohammed to work at a task worthy of him, which will be something like cleaning the Devil’s septic tank from the inside out, and from the bottom to the top.

And using Comrade 0bama as the squeegee.

Worth repeating.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

[sport]

What are you saying in English?

[2ndDivisionVet]

"I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." ~Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. The Audacity of Hope

[mkjessup]

403 Forbidden
This file removed due to violation
of Imageshack Terms of Service or
by user request

Well Image Shack has just demonstrated their willingness to kiss the ass of Islam.

Cowards.

[TigersEye]

I agree with you 100%. I wouldn't change or add a word.

Thanks for the ping, pandy. Well worth reading.

[pandoraou812]

I thought so too!