I think there may be more to that also. I think it provided a distraction so that Cheney could break the rule by not even asking the question - which may be the most the Soros machine could get Cheney to do in the charade he was told he had to play.
The conservative leaders who are cited as going along with Obama’s placement as POTUS did not fuss and holler about the illegality of it - but just about every one of them had some anomaly so that they never publicly did what they were legally required to do either. Cheney is an example. It’s said that he went along with Obama’s placement because he didn’t fuss. But he also didn’t fulfill the legal requirement of calling for objections either. He (purposely, I believe) left out that legality. Pelosi’s public orgasm allowed Cheney’s defiance to go under the radar of most.
Chief Justice Roberts had the same kind of thing. There is no public footage to prove that Roberts ever gave the legally-required oath. It’s said he did it in private. This was perhaps a concession so that Roberts could be SAID to go along with the charade when he couldn’t stomach the illegality of actually doing it for real.
In similar fashion, Justice Stevens gave Biden the oath to be Vice President but when shaking Biden’s hand afterwards called him “Mr President”. Very possibly a public protest reflecting that Stevens knew Biden is the only one Constitutionally able to act as President.
Justice Alito pretended to Orly Taitz that he knew nothing about the eligibility lawsuits, though a later comment by Justice Thomas revealed that they DID know about the suits and were purposely evading them. Alito is neither stupid nor senile; he put on a front because he couldn’t stomach having the public believe they truly refused to hear the cases.
Thomas’ own comment - unsolicited, out of the blue, and very serious and uncomfortable to everybody until Thomas smiled so people could pretend it had been a joke - was a way of telling the public that SCOTUS was particularly evading the issue, which is dereliction of their legal responsibility that no real justice would ever joke about.
That’s 3 conservative justices, one liberal justice, and VP Cheney who publicly balked at the charade they were supposed to carry out - whose involvement in the charade is used to contend that Obama’s legitimacy was affirmed by these conservatives.
The more I think about it, the more I believe that these anomalies are deliberate red flags by these people, to show that they DIDN’T affirm Obama’s legitimacy. They had to go along with the charade - I believe because Soros and the Islamists threatened to create a panic that would destroy the capitalist world economy if their coup in America was halted.
What’s happening now is a Soros-Islamist-Obama nightmare, with the American people angered about the Ground Zero victory mosque, and people realizing that Obama - as he said himself to the Egyptian ambassador and as the Muslim world has claimed all along - “was and still is a Muslim who supports the Muslim agenda” - the agenda of worldwide sharia which enslaves or executes all infidels, and the destruction of the US and Israel.
Their plan to sneak this coup quietly past an unsuspecting America is not working. It will be REALLY interesting to see whether they go the next step in communist coup fashion and create a critical crisis that allows them to declare martial law and use the military to crush all dissent. That is the typical communist strategy.
Janet Napolitano’s recent claim that a terrorist attack may be imminent could be the stage-setting for their next move. Somebody suggested that the Koran burning issue, while not good PR for the Islamists, could set the stage for Hezbollah and/or Hamas sleeper cells in the US to create the terroristic crisis Soros wants, in order to do this last step in the communist coup: martial law and military takeover. It appears that Ahmadinejad may have been sending LOTS of additional recruits our way via Venezuela and our southern border (which Obama refuses to protect and is suing to keep Arizona from protecting).
I guess we won’t know until we see. At this point nothing could surprise me.
FYI
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2587167/posts?page=9#9
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2587167/posts?page=15#15
Anyone can renounce their US citizenship, even Soebarkah.
15 posted on Saturday, September 11, 2010 1:21:48 AM by SvenMagnussen
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2587167/posts?page=20#20
That’s a false narrative to protect a usurper.
A minor can sign a contract, but it is unenforceable by the the contractor
(i.e. the contractor cannot repossess property or sue to enforce rights against the minor).
So, many people believe minor’s cannot enter into a contract. They can and they do.
But the contractor is exposed to loss if the minor does not choose to honor the contract.
In the case of a US citizenship renouncement, a minor must appear before US official and formally revoke their renouncement and swear an oath of allegiance to the US.
Once this is done, the minor recovers their US citizenship as a naturalized citizen and not a Natural born citizen.
Natural born citizens do not have to swear an oath of allegiance their country because the allegiance is considered to be naturally occurring.
20 posted on Saturday, September 11, 2010 1:45:30 AM by SvenMagnussen
***
Again, I haven’t a clue if Sven’s theory is correct.
But I do admire the way he argues his position at Obama Conspiracy.
I really am looking forward to the day when I do NOT post anymore about Obama’s eligibility.
The day:
Obama announces he will not seek reelection.
Enough states have “birther” bills.
Another candidate wins Democratic nomination for 2012.
That day cannot come soon enough.