I’ll find the relevant UIPA laws and OIP legal opinions and post them for you to review. Obama released his private information to the public intentionally, not inadvertantly.
The HDoH can release copies of vital records to the general public if the individual or his/her representative authorizes that release. A relevant OIP opinion letter establised that publicly disclosing one’s own information inherently provides such an authorization.
Yes, the Hawaii AG disagrees with the OIP’s interpretation of the relevant UIPA law. That’s why they refuse to release copies. A resident of Hawaii could bring a lawsuit to enforce the law just as citizens regularly file lawsuits to compel the release of documents that should be released under FOIA but are denied.
An official declaration from a governing authority that Obama is a natural born citizen is not an inadvertant disclosure of private data. That statement created a right to examine the information considered by the authority in making the determination. The relevant OIP opinions agree.
Inadvertently not inadvertantly. Geez, I misspelled it twice.
Exactly. Well-stated.
The only reason a judicial appeal hasn’t been filed is because all the Hawaii officials have shown themselves to be so corrupt that there’s no reasonable expectation of a just judge in Hawaii.
Pretty sad.
I’ll find the relevant UIPA laws and OIP legal opinions and post them for you to review. Obama released his private information to the public intentionally, not inadvertantly.
The HDoH can release copies of vital records to the general public if the individual or his/her representative authorizes that release. A relevant OIP opinion letter establised that publicly disclosing one’s own information inherently provides such an authorization.
Yes, the Hawaii AG disagrees with the OIP’s interpretation of the relevant UIPA law. That’s why they refuse to release copies. A resident of Hawaii could bring a lawsuit to enforce the law just as citizens regularly file lawsuits to compel the release of documents that should be released under FOIA but are denied.
An official declaration from a governing authority that Obama is a natural born citizen is not an inadvertant disclosure of private data. That statement created a right to examine the information considered by the authority in making the determination. The relevant OIP opinions agree.
If anybody really, truly wants to see Obama’s long form, vault copy birth certificate, just have legitimate cause for examination, go to a judge and get a subpoena. With a subpoena, the release happens WITHOUT Obama’s permission.
Any birth document released under any other circumstance will be a certified copy of the COLB.
However there is no additional information on a Hawaii long form that is relevant to Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution. The Constitution requires place of birth and date of birth plus 14 years residence in the US. A certified copy of the Certification of Live Birth meets those requirements (except for documenting 14 years of residence in the US).