Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Farah and GOProud Chairman Christopher Barron will square off in a debate later this month at WND’s convention.

Farah dropped Coulter from a speaking engagement at WND’s annual “Taking America Back” convention in Miami for agreeing to speak at GOProud’s “Homocon” party in New York.

Farah's now an open hypocrite, not just an implicatory one. First he attacked one of the most effective, focused and powerful conservatives in the country for meely planning to speak of conservative issues to gays. Oh no, must ban speech all together, for any reason, to gays - and that's a conservative principle?

Now Farah will speak to gays, but that's different because, well, because he's Farah! Ann might find common ground with gays, talk about the Constitution and conservative political issues, bring in votes while refusing the gay agenda without throwing out the gays themselves. Whereas Farah will merely remind them they are damned, and they can go stick their votes where the sun don't shine, conservative or not.

Therefore: Farah may speak with "conservative" approval, while Ann may not.

Bull. Bible thumpers are not "conservatives" - they are bible thumpers. There are many "kinds" of conservatives, who believe in conservative principles because they believe in the constitution of negative rights. That's WHAT is being conserved - and with it, protection for bible thumping bigots and homosexual bigots to spew their mutual hate at each other.

Real conservatives protect them both, and the economy, and due process, and everything else.

24 posted on 09/05/2010 11:34:23 AM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker
bring in votes while refusing the gay agenda without throwing out the gays themselves.

You simply don't get the concept of the story the Camel's Nose, do you. No one has told them they can't vote conservative. That's NOT what they want. They want to force conservatives to accept their agenda.

26 posted on 09/05/2010 11:40:00 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
bible thumping bigots

You have much more in common with the average member of the Democrat Party than you do with conservatives.

27 posted on 09/05/2010 11:40:13 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (With God, Obama can't hurt us. Without God, George Washington couldn't save us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
bible thumping bigots and homosexual bigots

THAT statement is what is bigoted. Most conservatives know, it isn't all about me, it's about the country and what is best for it. GOProud is not about what is best for the country7, only about what they THINK is best for homosexuals, which of course is an oxymoron. They are about nothing else. Oh they may have a fiscally conservative view point here and there, but that is all. By7 encouraging a gay plank in the party, the GOP would lose much more than is gained.

28 posted on 09/05/2010 11:41:38 AM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
Bible thumpers are not "conservatives" - they are bible thumpers.

Agreed. The problem with both Christians and gays is that so many of them are Christian or gay BEFORE they are an American conservative. The only time you can count on an American conservative really being one is when they're conservatives FIRST. And you don't get that with either uber-religious types or sexual-identity politics types.

58 posted on 09/05/2010 1:20:59 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
Here, Here!

While I do not agree with one iota of the "gay agenda", what two people, or three, or four, do in the privacy of their home is their business. I believe in the constitution, and I believe that the constitution provides for certain privacy rights and due process. As Pope John Paul put it best, "...love the sinner, hate the sin..." and that is where I am at with homosexuality.

62 posted on 09/05/2010 1:49:20 PM PDT by abigkahuna (Step on up folks and see the "Strange Thing" only a thin dollar, babies free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker

Real conservatives know that the homosexual agenda, which includes promoting sexual perversion as normal and natural, is the exact opposite of conservatism.

The homosexual agenda is destroying freedom of religion, speech and association, and using our tax dollars to indoctrinate children in schools K-12 all over the country.


112 posted on 09/05/2010 5:34:34 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker

So you’re saying that anyone who thinks homosexual acts are unnatural, unhealthy and immoral, and doesn’t want the homosexual agenda enforced is a bigot, eh?


113 posted on 09/05/2010 5:35:40 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
Bible thumpers are not "conservatives" - they are bible thumpers. There are many "kinds" of conservatives, who believe in conservative principles because they believe in the constitution of negative rights. That's WHAT is being conserved - and with it, protection for bible thumping bigots and homosexual bigots to spew their mutual hate at each other.

Real conservatives protect them both, and the economy, and due process, and everything else.

You reasoning misses one obvious fact. Religion (bible thumping as you term it) is protected under the Constitution which is primarily premised upon the right of the people to govern themselves as they possess unalienable rights endowed by the Creator. Homosexual sex premised rights, on the other hand, is but a recent absurd leftist novelty that derives its authority from imposition upon the people and is not nor ever has been a Constitutionally guaranteed practice...

Real "conservatives" have a clue -they understand the difference, they oppose government imposed homosexualism and embrace the Constitution -they do NOT embrace homosexually absurd leftist notions of rights premised upon orifice diversity!

129 posted on 09/05/2010 6:13:08 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker; 50mm; Old Sarge; darkwing104

There’s some bait out tonight.

More than one....

IBTZ


146 posted on 09/05/2010 6:57:36 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
protection for bible thumping bigots

Thanks for outing yourself. Run along back to DU, will you?
170 posted on 09/05/2010 7:52:40 PM PDT by Antoninus (It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker

Go back to the DUmp, scumbag (no offense to scum.) You’ve just been reported for your blatant Christophobia. Not allowed here. Go play in the sewer instead.


283 posted on 09/06/2010 10:14:38 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson