Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Fossil; eyedigress
Now the question is “intent” of the legislatures who sponsored the law.

I'm sure the intent of the law is to let police deal with the situation and not have the extra burden of sorting out the good from the bad when it comes to armed bands or individuals moving about during the emergency. It allows someone to protect his own premises. And in a perfect world, that would be great--sort of like government involvement in marriage is fine...as long as everyone operates in a traditional marriage view.

But when there's a forced evacuation or a corrupt state, this is a dangerous law. And as eyedigress rightly points out, one might be in violation of the state law if one were to take an otherwise prudent course of action.

120 posted on 09/02/2010 8:12:57 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring
But when there's a forced evacuation or a corrupt state, this is a dangerous law. And as eyedigress rightly points out, one might be in violation of the state law if one were to take an otherwise prudent course of action.

Agreed fully. Founders understood that our form of government would only work with a moral people. That is the danger we are in today. It applies to both citizens and our "representatives".

Jefferson~ "A people ignorant and free, never was and never will be"

126 posted on 09/02/2010 9:39:00 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson