IMHO...a “fraud” suit actually has the best chance of producing a birth certificate or showing none exists. The law is designed to support business. A “fraud’ suit makes the issue “just business” as is more likely to be effective in this venue. No court in the land will carve new Constitutional territory that most “birthers” would hope for.
That brings up a question I’ve had for some time. I hope somebody can help me with it. What all kinds of civil lawsuits can one person bring against another, and which kinds might apply here?
For instance, the HDOH officials are screwing me every way to Texas. I can’t file a criminal lawsuit. I’ve reported their potential crimes to law enforcement and to the HI government watchdogs and nobody will do anything. So what are my options? What kind of suit can I file against government bureaucrats - and specifically what kind of suit would get past Hawaii and into an appeals court, since nothing in the Hawaii government can be trusted at this point?
Or what kind of suit could be brought against the other players here? How could Nancy Pelosi (who perjured herself) be sued? How could Joe Sandler (who suborned Pelosi’s perjury) be sued?
We all know this whole system has been one great big fraud, but what kinds of fraud are there in legal terms, and what kinds can a person file a civil suit over?
I actually do agree that a person is more likely to get discovery or justice from a lower court than from a higher court - because I believe SCOTUS has been told they will avoid this issue or else Soros and the Islamists will make another run on the bank and destroy the entire western economy. But as somebody else noted, they can’t threaten everybody. If they threatened everybody then there would be that many more people that they have to try to keep tabs on, and that many more who might be persuaded to come clean with the story. Some low-position judge who hasn’t had Soros knocking at his door is much more likely to spill some beans than SCOTUS at this point.
Ultimately the issue would have to be resolved by SCOTUS so we need to make sure they are not still hostage to Soros when it arrives at their desks. But if a lower judge grants discovery before any appeals can stop it, the cat will be out of the bag. That may well be our best bet. Just a gut-level feeling.
Janice Okubo was trying to wiggle her way out of the “date filed” vs “date accepted” issue when she revealed exactly what was needed to show that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery. The back door almost always works better than the front, when the front is heavily guarded.