It took a while, but I have come to see Leo Donofrio’s frustration with citizen's who don't understand the law. We can't use the legal system if we don't have evidence. Obama has cleverly used legal trickery to deny us his documents. But he can't deny his own words, which define him as a native born citizen of the U.S. and not a natural born citizen. He told everyone his father was Kenyan. Those all may be lies, but his words make him ineligible. If enough people understand, OUR courts must act. They are already evading their responsibility.
I agree, and the court definitely needs to affirm that.
But I believe that the courts are being held hostage. I spent a lot of time being so angry at SCOTUS for “avoiding” the issue - angry that Clarence Thomas could laugh at it. And then I got on a computer where I could see the actual video of what Thomas said. He was not joking. There was nothing joking about what he said. There was uncomfortable silence, and then Thomas started to try to bring it around to a joke, by smiling.
That man brought up that issue unsolicited and in a serious manner because he is furious at what they are doing. He had to cover it with a laugh because he wasn’t supposed to bring attention to the issue and had to allow a gracious “out” or he would get in trouble.
The rulings the judges have given out are so ridiculous they are laughable. The issue has been “Twittered”? The evidence might “embarrass” Obama? There was no way Keyes could have won anyway? Silence because it’s not a serious enough issue to consider, unlike penalties for cigarette makers which is earth-shaking to the Republic? (But then a later uncomfortable, unsolicited and out-of-the-blue reference to them “avoiding” the issue.)Can’t do anything until he’s President, followed by can’t do anything because he’s already president?
And the judges have surrounded themselves with situations that reek of corrupt influence. SCOTUS having a private meeting with Obama right before they were to decide whether to hear a case involving Obama? Judge Carter hiring a legal assistant from the company defending Obama, while scheduled to decide a case about Obama? Those are not accidents. Carter specifically hired that guy at that time for a reason - knowing it gives the appearance of corrupt influence.
Even the inauguration itself. Justice Stevens called Joe Biden “Mr President” after administering the oath of office to him, and then retired from SCOTUS shortly afterwards. The actual oath to Obama being botched publicly so nobody could see Roberts administer the legally-binding oath.
And Congress itself. Cheney never did ask for objections to the certification of the electoral vote, as required by law. Pelosi started a standing ovation instead. Those who say that Congress certified the election should note that Cheney did NOT do what was required by law. There weren’t any written objections anyway so there would have been no harm done by Cheney just asking the question, but he still didn’t do it. Why not? Why didn’t he play along with the charade?
After seeing all these otherwise-trustworthy people join in lock-step with the official narrative but still leaving these little hints that something’s not right, I believe they’ve been taken hostage. I believe they’ve been told that if they resist the communist-Islamist coup, Soros/Islamists will collapse the entire western economy just as Soros has spent at least the last 15 years doing to the economies of individual countries - and was convicted in 2006 of doing in France.
So anyway, I believe the conservative justices are “avoiding the issue” because they don’t want to have to make a ruling under duress that will forever set the precedent and undo the Constitution. And they don’t like it one bit. They are leaving signs to let people know something is wrong.
The more I see what is going on, the more I believe that the survival of Constitutional America literally hangs on whether we can protect ourselves from economic terrorism at the hands of Soros/Islamists. Everything Obama has done fits the scenario I’ve presented of Obama as a puppet who was put in place by Soros/Islamists using economic terrorism to hold the patriotic leaders of the nation hostage. The stuff that doesn’t make any sense at all suddenly makes sense if that’s what’s going on.
I’m not an economist. I don’t know what it would take to protect us from economic terrorists like Soros and the Islamists. I do know that the leaders of this communist coup do not want to prevent it, any more than they care to prevent terrorist attacks on airplanes or the illegal invasion on our southern border.
This may be the saddest thing I’ve ever said on Free Republic: The economic mess we’ve made of this country, the way we seem to be teetering on the edge of a precipice, may mean that it is too late for America to be saved. There may be too many ways that the powers who want one world government can control the economy and hold us hostage.
I do believe that as long as that threat can be held over the heads of the conservative justices, no case seriously damaging to the communist coup will ever be decided the right way - even after Obama is out of office. That doesn’t bode well for the country, with the Arizona enforcement law, healthcare reform, net neutrality, second amendment rights, and so many other issues pending, and the illegal takeovers of the banking, auto, and student loan industries needing to be repealed.
What I really need is input from economic people who have any idea whether or how America could protect itself from this kind of economic terrorism.