Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Coup, Through and Through (2 of 3)
"jbjd" blog ^ | 08.17.10 | jbjd

Posted on 08/18/2010 1:19:10 PM PDT by jbjd

© 2010 jbjd

A COUP, THROUGH and THROUGH (2 of 3) is the second installment in the 3-part series describing the fraud pulled off at the 2008 DNC Services Corporation Presidential Nominating Convention in order to ensure Obama would receive the nomination so his name would appear on the general election ballot. (For the first installment, go to A COUP, THROUGH and THROUGH (1 of 3))

Much of this article consists of comments I posted on blogs in August 2008, which provide historical and retrospective context for the conclusions at which I presently arrive. PLEASE READ THESE COMMENTS, in order, imagining you are a part of the Obama campaign’s team of dirty tricksters. This will help you understand the way in which events leading up to the convention unfolded, and how and why in the end, they had to pull off a coup in order to secure the nomination.

Part 2: Lead-up to the Coup

Recall that the motive of the movers and shakers behind candidate Obama, was to get his name on the general election ballot by making him the nominee of the Democratic Party as far as possible in advance of the 2008 DNC Services Corporation Presidential Nominating Convention. But notwithstanding the nefarious means they had employed throughout the primary and caucus contests, they had nonetheless failed to secure the nomination. No matter what they tried, they could not undermine Clinton into relinquishing her bid for the nomination. Why, even now that the primary season was over, the candidate only suspended but did not end her campaign. So, over the summer Obama’s minions, having failed to secure the nomination based on the number of delegates pledged to him, now set out to corral the hundreds of delegates pledged to her, determined to steal his nomination before the convention....

(Excerpt) Read more at jbjd.org ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: barackobama; dncconvention; nancypelosi; votebindingstate

1 posted on 08/18/2010 1:19:13 PM PDT by jbjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jbjd

bump for later


2 posted on 08/18/2010 1:43:02 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator ( Where is Hugh Series?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbjd

A lot of revisionist history going on there.

It was the Clinton’s that kept trying to poach Obama’s delegates.

Up to and including during the convention.


3 posted on 08/18/2010 1:58:47 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad
Talk. Talk. Talk. Evidence? I showed you evidence. Enough with the accusations. The point is, just like in the case of states that require candidates to be eligible for office in order to have their names printed on the ballot; when the law is broken, who cares?
4 posted on 08/18/2010 2:16:42 PM PDT by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jbjd

The October surprise: a political coup

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-phoenix/the-october-surprise-a-political-coup


5 posted on 08/18/2010 4:04:09 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Voting does not a coup make. Acting outside of the bounds of law so as to obtain power, now, that’s a coup. Only, sometimes, it is less obvious. Having to wait 2 (two) or 4 (four) years to legally vote out of office someone who according to the law, should never have been in; is too high a price to pay. Because the damage done by the kind of person who unlawfully insinuated himself or herself into office, could take generations to reverse.

Besides, all this glee at prospective purging does nothing to educate the public about how our political system works. It just makes us feel good, temporarily.

But nothing will change. Because we still haven’t insisted on enforcing the laws that were broken to install BO into office. So why should the next person even listen?


6 posted on 08/18/2010 4:17:18 PM PDT by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jbjd

TRUE.

Maybe I was not clear enough. Democrats do not paly to lose an election. They won’t lose gracefully.

My point was to expect something so outrageous in October so that Democrats would rally around Obama and steal all the oxygen from Republican momentum. A possible assassination attempt,a nuke by Israel, a nuke in the US are all possible. This crowd will use anyting and everything to steal the election any way it can. This has to be something so outrageous that people just won’t get over it.

People are counting down the days to the election expecting this to happen. Since I know this crowd I expect them to do something so impossibly irrational that people won’t know how to come out of their confusion and the election might tip back towards Obama.

Imagine if a story came out that a plot was in the works to threaten Obama’s life. What would that do to democrat turn out. They could milk the story until the election to get maximum sympathy.

After the election, they could say an investigation yielded very little and it was a false alarm. You say this is impossuble. Look at what they did to Senator Ted Stevens. They manufactured 100% a case against him for corruption long enough to destroy his reelection. After the election the judge comes out and says the DOJ prosecutors exhibited the worse case of prosecutorial misconduct he had ever seen and there was no case against Stevens; nevertheless, the democrats committed fraud against the senator. He lost and then they said oh! well we goofed. Sorry!

My bones are creaking and they are telling me that this is a very, very likely scenario.

This would be a media bonanaza. You can see them saying:” Will Americans rally around the president in his time of need” etc.

The only way to mitigate this is if the alternative media gets wind of this ahead of time and shows the fraud. I am expecting this with certainty.


7 posted on 08/18/2010 4:39:50 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

I hear you; but what troubles me is this scenario. Citizens of the great state of Texas who, knowing their election (ballot) laws were violated when Boyd Richie, Chair of the Texas Democratic Party Certified to state election officials Barack Obama was qualified for office in order to get them to print his name on the ballot, notwithstanding he refuses their request to produce documentary evidence that could establish he is either a citizen or natural born; filed complaints with AG Abbott (R) asking him to conduct a criminal investigation; just sit on their hands and wait till he hears them. Instead of making him listen.


8 posted on 08/18/2010 6:26:25 PM PDT by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jbjd

Well it is abundantly obvious that there is very damaging information in Obam’s documents. I mean quite conveninetly even his mother’s passport documents have been destroyed quite by accident. Please. This is all about massive amounts of power. It is safe to say that he is not eligible or that the information on his documents is so bad that it would cripple the country. Power is power. The next chapter will occur when the Republicans are in charge. What comes out will show us if the Republicans are the flip side of the same coin.

Reelecting people like McCain is dusturbing.

I just wrote an article entitled: “The problem with McCain is that he was for amnesty before he was against it.” meaning that he will throw his base under the bus as soon as he is reelected. Olympia Snow and susan Collins are the same.

I hope we don’t have a crushing October surprise.


9 posted on 08/18/2010 7:39:24 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GilGil
No, I disagree completely. The R's are just as culpable. (AG Abbott is a (R).) (The Republican Party of Texas ("RPT") is silent.) I write about R acquiescence in several articles, including CLOWNS to the LEFT of ME; JOKERS to the RIGHT (1 of 2) and (2 of 2). No one's hands are clean in this one. No one. I have no idea what information is contained in BO's documents and I could not care less. Citizens tried to keep their ballots clean by enacting laws saying only candidates qualified for office can get their names printed on the ballot. In TX, Boyd Richie swore BO was eligible. But he refuses to say how he knew. I say, then, he did not know. That's fraud. (Have you read the TX citizen complaint of election fraud to AG Abbott, in the sidebar of my blog?) The R's could end this immediately. They are the same as the D's. Why fix a broken system that could benefit them next time? I say, COUNTRY before CLUB.
10 posted on 08/18/2010 8:50:08 PM PDT by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

McCain is not a NBC, either. Did you know, he only became a citizen through statute? http://www.michiganlawreview.org/assets/fi/107/chin.pdf


11 posted on 09/28/2010 6:25:56 PM PDT by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

I tend not to engage in the ‘predictions’ business. I have a difficult enough time trying to de-construct what went wrong and fix the system so that it work as the Founders intended, next time.


12 posted on 09/28/2010 6:27:37 PM PDT by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

...more specious accusations, without documentary evidence, to counter a well reasoned argument supported with evidence of delegate poaching which, went sent to the GA AG, prompted him to intervene...


13 posted on 09/28/2010 6:29:40 PM PDT by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jbjd

Yes! I did know but the difference with Obama is that everything is on the up and up. McCain is not hiding anything. Obama is hiding everything!


14 posted on 09/29/2010 11:04:23 AM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson