In what post? And that's "immaterial".
that gives someone license to take her out of context.
Take her out of context?! OMG! Her whole speech in much worse than the excerpt!
She says she acted in a way based on the color of a man's skin, and she's critical of her own actions.
While accusing Republicans of being racist for opposing Obama. In the SAME speech! LOLOL!!! Oh yeah. She's changed. And the NAACP didn't laugh and applaud. Listen, too many have seen the video. You can try to tell them they didn't see what they saw but it ain't gonna work out for you.
Post # 154.
"Maybe she's a Marxist, maybe she's a racists, maybe she's a child-beating axe murderer. It's ALL immaterial to Brietbart's characterization (or mischaracterization) of her speech, and the excerpts of the speech he posted online."
And, you're now the spelling police? That should keep you busy.
"OMG! Her whole speech in much worse than the excerpt!"
Ann Coulter doesn't agree....
""The whole key to this story is that Andrew Breitbart was set up. He was sent a tape that, as we now know, was massively out of context. It did look like this woman was saying something racist. When she first said it was taken out of context . . . we've heard that before from politicians telling racist jokes. This is the first time in world history it was literally taken out of context."It was a lovely speech. Of course the White House reacted that way -- of course you reacted the way you did. Anyone would have. I think Breitbart ought to reveal his source, because he was set up. This was a fraud. The person who sent the edited tape has to know what the full speech said, and whomever sent only that segment to Andrew Breitbart is the one who should apologize to Shirley Sherrod."
I'll have to side with Coulter. Let me guess, Coulter's a troll and Dummie plant, right?