Post # 154.
"Maybe she's a Marxist, maybe she's a racists, maybe she's a child-beating axe murderer. It's ALL immaterial to Brietbart's characterization (or mischaracterization) of her speech, and the excerpts of the speech he posted online."
And, you're now the spelling police? That should keep you busy.
"OMG! Her whole speech in much worse than the excerpt!"
Ann Coulter doesn't agree....
""The whole key to this story is that Andrew Breitbart was set up. He was sent a tape that, as we now know, was massively out of context. It did look like this woman was saying something racist. When she first said it was taken out of context . . . we've heard that before from politicians telling racist jokes. This is the first time in world history it was literally taken out of context."It was a lovely speech. Of course the White House reacted that way -- of course you reacted the way you did. Anyone would have. I think Breitbart ought to reveal his source, because he was set up. This was a fraud. The person who sent the edited tape has to know what the full speech said, and whomever sent only that segment to Andrew Breitbart is the one who should apologize to Shirley Sherrod."
I'll have to side with Coulter. Let me guess, Coulter's a troll and Dummie plant, right?
I don't give a flying monkeys tail what Coulter thinks. I don't care what Limbaugh thinks. I don't care what ANY of them think. I am not a member of group think. Got it?
I'm sorry if you need them to feel vindicated in your opinion. I use fact.
And the fact is that this woman's whole speech was racist.
The fact is that the NAACP laughed when she was telling them that a white man, while telling her he was superior, was asking her for help and she was deciding just how MUCH help she'd give him.
The fact is that she said Republicans opposing Bam are racist.
I heard her. And I don't need Coulter or anyone else to tell me that I didn't.