Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin ...What’s the big problem with refudiate? From Dictionary.com
Dictionary.com ^ | 07/20/10 | Dictionary.com The Hot Word

Posted on 07/19/2010 10:42:18 PM PDT by American Dream 246

Yesterday, Sarah Palin offered her opinion on a proposal to build a mosque in the vicinity of the September 11th site. Her words:

“Ground Zero Mosque supporters: doesn’t it stab you in the heart, as it does ours throughout the heartland? Peaceful Muslims, pls refudiate.”

This tweet is a pundit’s dream, a perfect storm for mud-slinging, flak, fuss, hurrahs, miffs, polemics, rows, rumpuses, and maybe some discussion.

Dictionary.com only cares about one word in the former Alaska governor’s message. Refudiate. Go ahead and look up refudiate on our site. Or any dictionary Web site for that matter. Nada, zilch.

There are a few ways to look at Sarah Palin’s use of “refudiate.” It’s clear that refute and repudiate are lurking in the background somewhere. One view is that it’s a non-word and sets a bad example for students of the English language. Palin’s response:

“‘Refudiate,’ ‘misunderestimate,’ ‘wee-wee’d up.’ English is a living language. Shakespeare liked to coin new words too. Got to celebrate it!”

“Misunderestimate” is a famous coinage by former President George W. Bush. “Wee-wee’d up” is a lexical creation by President Barack Obama. (Check out our previous take on a flub of Obama’s.)

Say what you will about her invocation of Shakespeare, but Palin raises a classic debate among linguists and lexicographers (people who create dictionaries). Dictionaries have always faced the dilemma whether to be prescriptive or descriptive. Is it the job of a dictionary to direct how words should be used, spelled, or pronounced, or should a dictionary simply document the current usage of the language?

When Palin, Bush and Obama coined their respective terms, they added neologisms (new words) to the messy, changing phenomenon we agree to call English. Whether a word transforms from a novelty into a standard part of our lexicon is a mysterious joy beyond the power of any politician, editor or individual to predict.

Commenter ”Pete Buick” deserves mention for pointing out a wonderful related term: malapropism, “an act or habit of misusing words ridiculously, esp. by the confusion of words that are similar in sound.” It’s up to you if you consider “refudiate” a malapropism or a simple corrigendum.

Weigh in: Do you think refudiate will end up in the dictionary? What do you make of Palin’s defense?


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: elections; islam; mosquee; obama; palin; refudiate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: dmz; KoRn

“She should have simply said: “I misspoke”, and moved on.”

Can’t you see she’s a genius? Her reply was intricately constructed to cause every media outlet in the world to include her in the grouping of US presidents.

While they go on about the comparison to Shakespeare, they don’t even mention the obvious inclusion she made with herself and US presidents. It is because they already see her in that group. Everyone does. That is how much capital she has. And see how it shows!

The “living language” thing is a crack about the leftist view of the Constitution as a ‘living document’. When the media make fun of it, a viewer can’t help but see them as making fun of themselves.

The mention of wee-wee’d up along side another president’s new word (and hers) that is obviously, infinitely more mature makes Obama look like a dope, and by extension the media who supports him while attacking her.

She even gets to be mentioned as similar to a *Founder* of America who wrote elegant missives about the beauty and necessity of inventing new words.

None of this is by accident. The woman is simply a genius. Take an honest look at her place in the world and just try to figure how anybody could get there without being one.


81 posted on 07/20/2010 11:46:13 AM PDT by Outership (Looking for a line by line Book of Revelation Bible study? http://tiny.cc/rPSQc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246
There are a few ways to look at Sarah Palin’s use of “refudiate.” It’s clear that refute and repudiate are lurking in the background somewhere. One view is that it’s a non-word and sets a bad example for students of the English language

Portmanteau word: Lewis Carroll, look it up.

82 posted on 07/20/2010 12:29:31 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (a 16 year old Australian girl already did it. And she did it right. - WWJD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Perhaps; but if she could speak it in Austrian in all 57 states, now THAT would be something!


83 posted on 07/20/2010 5:50:42 PM PDT by pingman (Price is what you pay, value is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Niteflyr

“frutile”—A new trend in DC decor?


84 posted on 07/20/2010 5:54:21 PM PDT by pingman (Price is what you pay, value is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

That’s where I keep mine.


85 posted on 07/20/2010 5:56:40 PM PDT by pingman (Price is what you pay, value is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

You’ve heard repudiate. Not refudiate.


86 posted on 07/20/2010 7:30:25 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clink

>>The professor stypified stipulated that there was no such word.<<

The proper way to express that is:

“The professor stypifulated that there was no such word.”

*sigh* it is so difficult being the Serpico of the Grammar Police...


87 posted on 07/20/2010 10:37:23 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246

What is there in a word? It is the meaning and feelings that matter. Social networking is changing the course of communication.


88 posted on 07/21/2010 5:10:08 AM PDT by AdamShelton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson