I realize that you're incredibly stupid, but may I point out -- once again -- that Kirk is not running against Lindsay Graham.
Why is this so hard? Oh, wait, you're stupid.
This isn't about purity or party infighting or any other damned thing.
It's about a 6-year Senate seat and if you want to know what a big (Biden)ing thing that is, ask Republicans in Minnesota. You know what they got? They got Franken.
Correction, we all got Franken.
I don't care about the petty politics of the IL GOP. Maybe you're the assistant chief vice underling for Podunk County and you think that if the party is small enough, then you get to run it. Here's the deal: The primary's over. And it was decisive. It was not even close.
You can whine and cry that the Kirk supporters in the GOP hierarchy didn't beg people that they oppose to run against him, but nobody won and that's the way it is. You are not going to win by pulling down people who won primaries fair and square. You're going to lose the Senate seat and lose what little influence you have in the state.
Time to follow Reagan's commandments. No more Sore Losermen. Want to advance conservatism? Elect a governor and give up this petty, childish jihad.
"This isn't about purity or party infighting or any other damned thing."
There are several reasons, for which you have been told repeatedly, and continue to disregard, as if they're not even a problem in your little fantasy world of "let's elect any Republican regardless of how destructive or disreputable they are." Guess what, these are real problems with real repercussions outside of IL. Maybe they don't effect your little spot out in the middle of an Iowa cornfield, but they effect the rest of us.
"It's about a 6-year Senate seat and if you want to know what a big (Biden)ing thing that is, ask Republicans in Minnesota. You know what they got? They got Franken. Correction, we all got Franken."
And here you produce examples that have NOTHING to do with the IL situation. Perhaps you're familiar with a concept known as voter fraud. Democrats managed to "find" enough votes AFTER the election along with judges willing to rubber stamp said fraud to install Franken. So much for the myth of Minnesota being a "clean state." Of course, they have a George Soros Secretary of State. But again, totally irrelevent to the discussion of Kirk.
"I don't care about the petty politics of the IL GOP."
Thank you. An honest admittance for a change. Because you don't care, I don't see how your uninformed opinion of this subject brings anything to this discussion. You're in a thread with people who DO know what is going on in IL and do give a damn about the slime that rises to the top there, aided and abetted by a bipartisan Chicago-Springfield crime coalition known as the Combine.
"Maybe you're the assistant chief vice underling for Podunk County and you think that if the party is small enough, then you get to run it. Here's the deal: The primary's over. And it was decisive. It was not even close."
It was not even a legitimate contest. There were no serious reformists running, and it was by design. You ever heard of a "fixed" race, Hoss ? The Combine let it be known they would have their candidates running in the general for the Senate race. Alexi/Kirk, no difference. Whichever won, the Combine would have their man in DC to join their other one, Dick Durbin.
"You can whine and cry that the Kirk supporters in the GOP hierarchy didn't beg people that they oppose to run against him, but nobody won and that's the way it is. You are not going to win by pulling down people who won primaries fair and square. You're going to lose the Senate seat and lose what little influence you have in the state."
Once again, you don't get it. We already LOST this race. Neither Alexi or Kirk is acceptable, both are puppets of a corrupt political alliance. Kirk doesn't serve the Republican party, he serves the IL Combine. The same outfit Zero serves. If it's a choice between a corrupt RINO or a corrupt Democrat, it's a no-brainer, you let the Democrats own it. Kirk will cause us a lot more damage than Alexi will, since Alexi will probably be heading to prison before long and will embarrass the Democrats. A Governor Brady can then appoint someone not tainted by the Combine to the vacancy, presuming he has the courage to face them down.
"Time to follow Reagan's commandments. No more Sore Losermen. Want to advance conservatism? Elect a governor and give up this petty, childish jihad."
Thanks for your worthless and ignorant advice. When you're interested in fighting corruption, you get back to us. Otherwise I suggest you stick to the cornfield and STFU.
You laugh at mention of the combine. You live in a naive fantasy world if you think democrats and corrupt Republicans in Illinois don't cooperate with each other.
Personal attacks.
I am stupid, you're right but the other people you are slandering are smart guys and you are an intellectual amoeba in comparison.
Repeating irrelevant crap like "Kirk won the primary" "KIRK WON THE PRIMARY" "KIRK WON THE PRIMARY" "Sore losers sore losers sore losers". That is a talking point by the way. And a silly one.
And your programmed thinking. Kirk=better than Alexi therefore you are for Kirk. He is better, you are right. In the same way genital warts is better than cancer.
No sign you acknowledge the argument I made, that there should be a minimum standard for a Republican. That a Republican at least shouldn't provide a "bipartisan" vote and face to far left causes. Which is a specific way in which a liberal Republican can be worse than a democrat. This is why Graham was mentioned. To compare. Do you at least understand? Or would I be off telling this to my wall and expecting a reply? If you disagree and think any R who's at least a little to the right of the rat should be accepted and supported that's fine.
Kirk being at best half a Republican isn't even what's most important. Here's what's important. I'll bold it so you don't miss it. The primary you keep crowing about is nothing but bad history. The general election is the future. And your boy Kirk is jeopardizing the possibly of a GOP majority. He's damaged goods. He will lose to Alexi. You want to beat Alexi? Then you should want Kirk out. If Kirk stays in Alexi will be a Senator at least until he's indicted and forced to resign. That's another thing. Alexi is in serious danger of being sent to prison in the next couple years. That would allow Brady to appoint a Republican. I know such a future scenarios no matter how likely seem fanciful and silly to people with 2 dimensional-thinking such as yourself so that's all I'll say about that.
The conservative candidate for Governor has a double digit lead. The liberal scandalized slag Kirk's numbers are dropping like a rock. Time for him to take a hike. Why won't you join us in our "childish jihad" to elect a Republican Senate? Do you work for Kirk? Are YOU a democrat? Do YOU want Alexi to win?
Since you keep repeating yourself I'll repeat myself in the off chance it helps you get it. Kirk will cost us this seat. This should be gain. It would be with a decent Republican who didn't lie about his military service. You want a GOP Senator from Illinois? Then you should want to Kirk to drop out otherwise at least temporary we will get a mobbed up democrat Senator.