Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Graybeard58; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy
And recent convert doesn't mean I don't think he is a bad person with evil intentions.

He is simply a far left RINO, who supports everything we are against.

But his sexuality has NOTHING to do with this race. It belittles our arguments and it belittles this website and all of the other IL FReepers who are trying to change candidates.

I don't want to be associated with out right liars when you have no evidence other than a guy who claims he had sex with him.

Do you remember the Duke LaCrosse case??? Did you believe the poor innocent stripper who tried to ruin three mens lives? That was just one case of a thousand false claims of sex, rape, whatever...

Obviously you are stuck in your ways and are clueless that you are belittling our arguments.

If an independent minded person came in a read your posts they would probably think you belonged to the KKK.

I don't know why you are so obsessed with this gay stuff, is there something troubling in your past that you haven't dealt with yet? Because there were quite a lot of people who were big time gay bashers who turned out to be gay themselves.

51 posted on 06/21/2010 9:00:09 AM PDT by Dengar01 (Go Blackhawks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Dengar01

it has everything to do with this race if he will not sign the federal marriage amendment.

it has everything to do with this race if he will allow homosexual politics to infest the military.

there is no need for toe tappers (ala whats his name at the airport) in public service or anywhere near public policy.


53 posted on 06/21/2010 9:19:31 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Dengar01
But his sexuality has NOTHING to do with this race.

That wasn't your original contention, that was telling me in effect to shut up or provide links, which I promptly did.

Having read the rest of your reply, I see that you deal heavily in personal attacks also. So go ahead with them, you are now having a monologue.

54 posted on 06/21/2010 9:44:43 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (No Romney,No Mark Kirk (Illinois), not now, not ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Dengar01

And Kirk is still queer.


55 posted on 06/21/2010 9:45:28 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (No Romney,No Mark Kirk (Illinois), not now, not ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Dengar01; Graybeard58

There’s no need for that.

Many people don’t like the idea of gays or anyone they view as morally degenerate holding public office.

Graybeard is convinced Kirk is gay. I’m not. (And I don’t care if he is)

There is no evidence whatever that Bush is gay.

I could say Brad Pitt is gay with no evidence as it was be the same as anyone who said Bush is gay.

The rumors about Kirk are credible. Is it proof worth of a court of law? No certainly not.

You seek a high level of proof before you’ll go there. That’s fine. Maybe it offends your sense of justice. It’s admirable that you are able to apply it without bias.

Graybeard may feel that liberals like Kirk and democrats don’t deserve any benefit of any doubt. Many would look at the idea of Kirk being gay helping to explain his mostly friendly positions on the gay agenda. Of course plenty of totally heterosexual liberals hold the same positions.


65 posted on 06/22/2010 5:05:32 PM PDT by Impy (DROP. OUT. MARK. KIRK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson