“World Net Daily is far from reliable”
Try “not even close to unreliable.”
They throw nearly EVERYTHING they see and hear into one, big pot, without corroborating evidence, and then ignore the consequences when they get it wrong.
WND is in it for the moolah and these past experiences should make you think twice about automatically giving WND the benefit of the doubt:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2531005/posts?page=43#43
I meant to say, “Not even close to being reliable.”