[Las Vegas Ron]

There is no evidence that an announcement was actually placed, all that's been offered up as “evidence” from micro fiche which is easily forged.

Secondly, the announcement doesn't say the baby was born in Hawaii, it's just an announcement that any proud new Grandparent might place.

[Wallop the Cat]

Yeah, right, that’s reasonable.

[rxsid]

"There is no evidence that an announcement was actually placed, all that's been offered up as “evidence” from micro fiche which is easily forged. Secondly, the announcement doesn't say the baby was born in Hawaii, it's just an announcement that any proud new Grandparent might place."

Precisely.

Furthermore, who's address is on the newspaper announcement announcing a birth of a boy (not specifically named by the way)? The grandparents address. Assuming the original fiche was not tampered with [there is evidence it may have been], the "announcement" was placed in the papers by the grandparents! Big friggin deal! He was born. Obviously. But where? The newspaper "announcements" are not proof of place of birth.

Besides, someone born with multiple allegiances isn't a natural born citizen of the U.S.