To: Las Vegas Ron; Wallop the Cat
"
There is no evidence that an announcement was actually placed, all that's been offered up as evidence from micro fiche which is easily forged. Secondly, the announcement doesn't say the baby was born in Hawaii, it's just an announcement that any proud new Grandparent might place."
Precisely.
Furthermore, who's address is on the newspaper announcement announcing a birth of a boy (not specifically named by the way)? The grandparents address. Assuming the original fiche was not tampered with [there is evidence it may have been], the "announcement" was placed in the papers by the grandparents! Big friggin deal! He was born. Obviously. But where? The newspaper "announcements" are not proof of place of birth.
Besides, someone born with multiple allegiances isn't a natural born citizen of the U.S.
153 posted on
06/10/2010 1:02:42 PM PDT by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid; Wallop the Cat
Besides, someone born with multiple allegiances isn't a natural born citizen of the U.S. Yep, that's the bottom line no matter what but I see that we still have questionable noobs showing up here and rehashing the same old crap.
They're like flies that continually need to be swatted, er I mean walloped!
173 posted on
06/10/2010 1:19:25 PM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson