Her director of health illegally hid until November of 2009 the administrative rules which reveal that any person is authorized to receive a non-certified copy of Obama’s abbreviated BC (COLB).
Her director of health made a public announcement of what is contained on the (multiple) birth records for Obama, which is forbidden in HRS 338-18a.
Her director of health then refused to release the documents she used in order to make her illegal statement, as required by Hawaii’s UIPA (FOI law).
Her director of health has overseen a department which is currently being investigated because it has apparently illegally destroyed permanent records, including the original birth index, index to foreign births, and the birth record for at least one individual.
Her director of health has perjured herself by giving testimony before a legislative hearing which exaggerates the actual requests they receive regarding Obama’s birth certificate by (IIRC) about 800%. She gave that testimony urging Hawaii to basically do away with their FOI law (UIPA) by allowing an agency to rule a person as a “vexatious requestor” who didn’t have to be answered.
There’s more but I’ll wait on that for right now.
You need to see http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/ .
I forgot to say that Fukino only said what the birth records(plural) for Obama claim. The very fact that there are multiple records when the only index data they have for him is for a birth record shows that the document they have has been amended, which means that according to statute the State of Hawaii CANNOT vouch for the accuracy of the claims made on it.
IOW, the Hawaii DOH has revealed through multiple communications that what they have for Obama does not rise to the standard of prima facie evidence. If any judge ever allows a case to be heard on its merits, everything Hawaii has for Obama is not enough to automatically trump any other birth claim.
That could be why Obama’s lawyers have only offered 2 things as evidence, for Judge Robertson to “note”: the online image of a COLB (which the HDOH has now indirectly confirmed as a forgery) and the online images of the birth anouncements (which will very soon also be proven as forgeries as well).