After the oil platform in the Gulf was destroyed, and all the talk about sabotage. I began to wonder if Obama not only allowed it to happen, but could he and his Fascist collaborators be involved in doing it. Then I remembered this video I ran about 6 Months ago and decided it might be worthwhile to bring it back for another look. After all, what if Obama decides to cancel the program before the Navy is able to detect the sub. How long would it be before our enemies get a hold of the sub and we start losing more than an oil platform?
1 posted on
05/04/2010 7:16:25 AM PDT by
OneVike
To: OneVike
I’ve heard stories about our sailors sorta slacking in their duties as of late. I fondly recall movies where sailors were always working, heads in scopes and paying attention to the mechanics of their vessels. Can any recent Navy vets attest to the readiness of our fleets?
2 posted on
05/04/2010 7:18:24 AM PDT by
rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
To: magslinger
To: Alex Murphy; JesusBmyGod; Whenifhow; rom; Hanna548; DvdMom; leftyontheright; FrdmLvr; jblann1; ...
Article with Video Ping!
Here is a video and an article about the Swedish submarine that has routinely sunk the USS Ronald Reagan Aircraft Carrier. The US Navy is still trying to figure out how to detect it.
What do you think chances are that the Obama regime will cancel the program before we can detect it? Thus giving those who hate us like the terrorist, China, or even Cuba the chance get the technology and destroy more than just an oil rig in the Gulf?
Well I am off to work, so go ahead and read the article I titled, Swedish Sub Sinks The USS Ronald Reagan and watch the video at the ChicoER Gate .
• Send FReep Mail to OneVike to get [ON] or [OFF] article and video Ping List •
4 posted on
05/04/2010 7:22:21 AM PDT by
OneVike
To: OneVike
Darn: Where was this post yesterday when I was being blasted for daring to say that a Sub could sneak past the US Navy and into the Gulf of Mexico. Not saying that it did but to hear the morons say that it is impossible for a sub to remain undetected in a body of water as large as the Gulf of Mexico is simply stupid.
7 posted on
05/04/2010 7:29:49 AM PDT by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: OneVike
One thing that comes to mind that has not been addressed: I don’t think Sweden spends a huge amount on its defense industry. So, how did they develop this sub and what was its cost relative to our latest round of subs? Have we taken a wrong turn down technology road somewhere?
hh
11 posted on
05/04/2010 7:41:07 AM PDT by
hoosier hick
(Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
To: OneVike
What you will see in this video is a report about the Swedish submarine, NemoSaltadSobrius, which cannot be detected by our navy. Nonsense, there are plenty of sensing systems which can detect that or any other submarine. Don't believe everything you read!
To: OneVike
Those blond, blue-eyed Swedish Subs are just sooo f%&@ing hard to spot!
29 posted on
05/04/2010 8:40:08 AM PDT by
TRY ONE
(Another Beer Summit.....another day in Debt)
To: OneVike
You see, Secretary Gates, this is why we have eleven carrier battle groups.
31 posted on
05/04/2010 8:53:15 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: OneVike
Sve_Dish stealth sub!
It's what's in the boat that counts!

We need volunteers to uncover this Sved Dish!
38 posted on
05/04/2010 9:27:39 AM PDT by
Young Werther
("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.
Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.
41 posted on
05/04/2010 12:10:08 PM PDT by
magslinger
(Tagline impounded as a threat to national security.)
To: OneVike; All
That is a periscope shot of USS George Washington (CVN-73), taken by USS Hammerhead (SSN 663) around 1992 (she was decommissioned sometime in 1995) when she popped up inside of our ASW screen during our shakedown cruise. Taking your picture through the periscope simulates firing a warshot that would not have missed, and they fire a green flare at the same time that lets the carrier's OOD know he just got had. Please note the clear and unobstructed view of the Navigation Bridge, the Flag Bridge as well as PriFly...
Whoops.
That picture is a scan of the original print of that warshot, and it was given to me in Newport News by my neighbor and good friend the COB of USS Hammerhead.
In fact our submarines exercise against our own fleet all the time, because it makes for excellent training for everyone all the way around.
43 posted on
05/04/2010 12:48:47 PM PDT by
Bean Counter
(We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office -- Aesop)
To: OneVike
I have been hearing essentially this same story since the 1980s.
50 posted on
05/04/2010 3:46:19 PM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: OneVike
66 posted on
05/05/2010 5:37:38 AM PDT by
AdmSmith
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson