Replies

PING to All.

Everyone is going to hate this long post, but it is important, and so are other information and Photos shown at the link.

Nolongerademocrat wrote:

"(also take note of that photo of them together - his uniform is not right...)"

[Thanks, nolongerademocrat.]

~ Excerpted:

"Pictured are Madelyn and “Sgt.” Stanley Armour Dunham in front of a Midwestern-style house implied to be near Ft. Leavenworth, KS.

" Notice the unusual angle of the house, tilting downward at 22.5 degrees. Both subjects are also leaning to the right, though not at the same angle as the house, so we can conclude they have been ‘compiled’ into the photo of the house. Madelyn’s polka-dotted dress seems normal, though there is an anomaly that appears upon closer inspection.

* "Stanley’s U.S. Army uniform: hat, belt, pants, and shirt are replete with anomalies.

* "His hat is a U.S. Marines hat, chin strap resting neatly above the visor.

"The back of the hat (because it has been cropped from another photo) and his hair appear to have been sliced with an Exacto knife. The gratuitous white-walls cut around the ears do not appear in other photos, nor do the innumerable facial blemishes, which resemble leprosy upon enlargement. Stanley’s shirt pocket appears to travel to his armpit, and contains a very large object the size of a book.

"The belt, due to the buckle’s small size, belongs on a Marine uniform. Though his trousers appear to be excessively creased in the front, the rear pocket carries an object the size of a canteen while the material itself is bunched like a plastic bag.

"At the bottom of the belt (where it meets the pants(, there is a noticeable gap that appears upon magnification. The gap reveals the color of Madelyn’s dress and more polka dots. [See Photo 1-C .] Other physical abnormalities include: the tip of Stanley’s right hand middle finger, which is darker in shade that the rest of that hand.

"His left hand, also a different shade, is 50% larger than the right hand, and his left arm is 25% longer than would be natural.

"Stanley’s entire head is also Photoshopped onto someone else’s body, and his face is darker than the rest of his skin, with the exception of the aforementioned finger. The upper torso of the Frankenstein is far too short for the rest of the body’s proportions.

"Again, we have the now-familiar look-the-other-way photo session, though this one is a classic."

"Photo 1-B, The “Exacto-knife Shot” (Upright)

"Photo 1-B is the result of adjusting the tilt effect found in photo 1-A. The author superimposed a grid over the original photo in order to straighten the house as it should appear in real life.

"Aligning the left wall of the house to cause it to become upright, or perpendicular to the ground, the porch rises unnaturally (upwards to the the right0. This adjustment forces all of the skewed elements (outside of the grid’s boundaries) from the photo, so it is now smaller in size.

"Now Stanley appears to be leaning slightly forward, Madelyn is leaning to her right, and we can see that the porch railing has been compiled into the photo. Straightening the photo causes at least 3 feet of the photo’s content to be rotated outside the grid, though doing so reveals the fraudulent nature of the setting, house, shrubs, and subjects. 0bama’s (aka Soetoro, et al) minions can do a better job than that—or can they?"

"Photo 1-C, Close-up of Stanley’s Belt

"The photo at left shows the unusual belt anomaly in close-up detail.

"At the point where the belt should cover Stanley’s trousers, there is actually a gap that reveals numerous polka dots found in the material of Madelyn’s dress. The photo has been ‘inverted’, so the dress is ‘white with black polka dots’.

"Though some of the dots are blurred, there are at least a dozen seen where Stanley’s belt and trousers should be but are not because of an abnormal gap. The black, vertical object is actually the belt loop of the trousers. Notice that there is no belt where there should be one.

"In short, this magnified section of the above photograph shows that it is has been constructed of multiple images and is fraudulent. Of course, you can zoom in on the original photos above to see the white polka dots which appear between Stanley’s trousers and belt."

"Photo 1-D, The aftermath of 100 bee stings

"The close-up head crop of Stanley and Madelyn Dunham (at left) reveals several anomalies which are not attributable to pixel distortion. Without this extreme magnification, it was already apparent that the head had been compiled into the photo and does not belong to the body below it.

"This magnification reveals many facial ‘lumps’ which resemble bee stings. The lumps appear on Stanley’s face, ears, and neck and seem to be manifesting on his hair and hat.

"No other part of the photo exhibits this phenomenon, except for the line which traverses Madelyn’s forehead.

"Again, these abnormalities are not found when magnifying the average family photo."

~ Photos, - and more information at the Link. - Can someone please get screenshots before this, too, disappears down the rabbit hole?:

http://web.me.com/donnicoloff/directlightproductions.com/Articles/Entries/2009/7/18_The_Three_Stooges_go_to_Washington,_Part_7-A.html

Somewhere on one of my hard drives are 2 pictures. One is an old issue of Stars & Stripes. Stanley's picture is in a football team photo. I think it was in Hawaii.

The other is an (old) article in the Syracuse Post Standard of Stanley Dunham holding infant Stanley Anne Dunham surrounded by 2 or three fellow soldiers.
I think it was taken at Fort Drummond. The gist of the caption was little Stanley Anne was the only female allowed. One of those cutesy, feel good pictures.

Fred, would you happen to have those pictures in your archives?

From Article"* "His hat is a U.S. Marines hat, chin strap resting neatly above the visor."

I got out my magnifying glass and I could see a gap between the visor and chin strap.
It looks like an army uniform to me. The Marines Uniform is real tweedy looking.

WWII Army Uniform

WWII Marine Uniform

Gig line is wrong on the belt..meaning..the tip of the belt the metal part..should be at the center of the trousers..the metal tip should be on line..above the zipper..

TY for the ping.... lots of info there,quite a story, not really sure I buy it.

New investigation into Obama background spells trouble ahead http://bit.ly/bWXJfe

For example, neither of Obama’s parents were citizens of the United States at the time of his birth.

I know nothing of military hats or belts of that era but the rest of the picture looks legit. As I’ve said before, because of the amount of bs this person creates in his/her writings, I’m disregarding anything he says.

You don’t need to go to the movie theater, or your TV or HBO to be entertained, you have the “thriller” right here:

.............................

The Three Stooges go to Washington, Part 7-A

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Barack Obama: Who’s your daddy?

By Don Nicoloff

July 18, 2009

The time has come when we shall lay to rest the question of Barack Hussein Obama’s (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) real father, the reason for so many name changes, and the revelation of hundreds, if not thousands of aliases tied to fraudulent real estate, insurance, and money-laundering transactions.

Let us be frank. Obama (aka Soetore, et al) was not born in Kenya. If he had been , he could prove it. He cannot. The fact that Obama (aka Soetoro, et al) has been able to find others willing to lie (or die) for him in that regard does not make it so. If he intended for us to believe that lie, he would have planted that seed in his autobiography, Dreams from My Father, the book that professional forensic analysts conclude was likely written by Weather Underground terrorist, William Ayers.

Obama (aka Soetoro, et al) was not born in Hawaii, either. If he had been, he could prove that. Presenting forged, fraudulent documentation and photos to the public via newspapers, magazines, TV show, political advertisements, and the Internet as substitutes for genuine documentation does not make it true, either. In fact, if we are to believe what his alleged African relatives swear they witnessed, Obama (aka Soetoro, et al) could not have been born in Hawaii, could he?

And what Truth could be so secret that the government of Hawaii must seal his Certificate of Live Birth? From what communicable disease are those official documents being protected? Swine flu? No, in this cast, the only possibility hinges on corruption—at the highest (or lowest) level.

So, where was Barack Obama (aka Barry Soetoro, et al) born and/or raised?

Papua, New Guinea. That’s right—Papua, New Guinea. All the signs are there. it is only a matter of connecting the dots and reading between the lines.

So, grab yourself a cup of coffee, tea, or your favorite non-alcoholic beverage, and prepare for a wild ride. Turn off the TV, the radio—even the music. Focus all of your attention on what you are about to read. We will begin to see more dots being connected, right before our very eyes, that we have in the past 100 years.

Imagine you are a parent and Obama (Soetoro, et al) has just proposed marriage to your daughter, and you could not give him your blessing, nor allow him to marry her until you learned the whole truth about him. Imagine that this would even be possible.

Imagine that you are the one to whom he has proposed. Would you not have a right to know such important details about his family, his race, his ethnicity, his nationality, his education, or his genes? Anything real, for that matter? Of course you would. Imagine that knowing the truth about those things could also be possible.

So why should it be any different for a whole nation or the people of the world to know the same things about its usurpation? After all, is is a critical requirement of the U.S. Constitution. There is no doubt about that. But there still remain a few questions about who is pulling the strings of a puppet Congress, Senate, Federal Elections Commission, and U.S. Justice Department. imagine that knowing that, too, is even possible.

Forget about ‘elections’. Those are staged. Bush 43’s election was a perfect example of that. So was Bill Clinton’s—all smoke and mirrors. We could probably arrive at the same conclusions by investigating all the presidential elections over the past 100 years, that is, if we could find any legitimate, untainted election records.

In order to get a handle on who is behind this most recent fraud perpetrated upon the American public—and the world—let us review the morsels of history that have been debunked within Parts 3-6 of this serial article. Americans have short memories, and so do historians. Forgive any repetition here. There are simply too many facts that might be overlooked by those with short memories, and there are too many statements of fact that have been (and will continue to be) debunked.

This seventh article will review all of the facts discovered in this proverbial needle-in-the-haystack exposé, before moving into new territory. Intuition will play a major role where records are, and have been, virtually non-existent.

The Dunham family: A web of misdirected tales

Barack Obama’s (aka Soetoro, et al) family “from Kansas” is a scripted fairy tale. Hoax might be the more appropriate description. The characters: Stanley Armour Dunham, Madelyn Lee (Payne) Dunham, and Stanley Ann Dunham were agents working for John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company and later, his Rockefeller Foundation. Rolla Charles Payne. Madelyn’s alleged father and Obama’s alleged maternal great-grandfather, worked as an agent for Standard Oil and was issued his Social Security number in Oklahoma, not as a farmer in Kansas. Misdirection is a common ploy of the international intelligence community, relying on the premise that those being misdirected lack the intelligence to tell the difference between a lie and the truth. The Dunham family’s story begins with misdirection.

http://web.me.com/donnicoloff/directlightproductions.com/Articles/Entries/2009/7/18_The_Three_Stooges_go_to_Washington,_Part_7-A.html