To: RegulatorCountry
So, according to Einstein, geocentrism is not so much a matter of "right" or "wrong," but a point of view based upon a CS or coordinate system, and, according to him, the debate was rendered moot by General Relativity.
Geocentrism claims that earth is a preferred frame of reference of one reason or another when in fact it is anything but. Even in general relativity, a non-rotating inertial reference frame can be considered preferred because it is the only one in which the laws of physics can be described without explicitly referencing distant masses.
To: messierhunter
Exactly.
Which is why the claim that the Earth is at the centre of the universe, is bull.
You’d have to do a whole circus of academic gymnastics, to account for all physical phenomena, to support that view.
To: messierhunter
I’ve seen multiple references and articles over the past few years, regarding a cosmological model attributed to astrophysicist Dr. George Ellis, of a semi-geocentric universe containing a naked singularity as a recycling mechanism, a model that does not require mysterious “dark matter,” messierhunter. It would seem your objections are not entirely valid.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson