To: messierhunter
I’ve seen multiple references and articles over the past few years, regarding a cosmological model attributed to astrophysicist Dr. George Ellis, of a semi-geocentric universe containing a naked singularity as a recycling mechanism, a model that does not require mysterious “dark matter,” messierhunter. It would seem your objections are not entirely valid.
To: RegulatorCountry
of a semi-geocentric universe containing a naked singularity as a recycling mechanismThat sounds kinda dirty.
51 posted on
03/07/2010 1:32:46 PM PST by
UCANSEE2
To: RegulatorCountry
Ive seen multiple references and articles over the past few years, regarding a cosmological model attributed to astrophysicist Dr. George Ellis, of a semi-geocentric universe containing a naked singularity as a recycling mechanism, a model that does not require mysterious dark matter, messierhunter. It would seem your objections are not entirely valid.
A) You did not address my objection that a geocentric universe requires explicitly referencing distant masses to derive its physics (ie, no other way to explain geocentric satellites).
B) There are models of the non-geocentric universe that do not require dark matter (MOND, Nonsymmetric Gravitational Theory, etc).
C) Dark matter is not explicitly referenced in our physical laws or equations (ie, you don't need to reference dark matter to compute the orbits of geocentric satellites and even MOND would be irrelevant).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson