New Global Warming Data Reveals Accurate “Hockey Stick” Graph

Pajamas Media ^ | February 25, 2010 | Pajamas Media

[KippLanham]

The data underlying the famous “hockey stick” global warming graph has finally been found after having earlier been misplaced by leading climate researchers. The newly recovered data confirms the accuracy of the abrupt upward turn in readings characteristic of the “hockey stick” shape found in many global warming projections.

Read more: http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2010/02/25/new-global-warming-data-reveals-accurate-hockey-stick-graph/

[SnakeDoctor]

Funny chart ... though it does have the “wild-eyed radicals” passing up the “reasonable person” in skepticism in the near future.

SnakeDoc

[GOPJ]

yawn

[Minn]

I absolutely love what the Canuckistanian gals did. In this politically correct age, celebrating a victory with booze and cigars, on the ice for all to see no less, is just fabulous .

[skimbell]

Naw, the temperature records were found underneath Hillary's Rose law firm billing records.

[thinking]

a friend of mine is dieing of Cancer....maybe we should spend more money of Cancer research....forget the global weather

[cpdiii]

So who can verify that the data input into the graph is not either wrong, made-up, or manipulated?

From Joe Isuzu of pajamas media, if you can not trust Joe who can you trust? :)

[cpdiii]

The inexcuseable part of all this, is the data they DESTROYED. If you are allowed to destroy actual data, you can form legitimate data to fit any paradigm you like. Then we have the data was was modified (ALGORythym used is ‘lost’, and the origional data is discarded - so the raw data cannot be analyzed, questioned or investigated. So, we have actual data, manufactured data, and a large pile of missing data. This does not include the data that exists, but these points do not support the theory they are proposing, thus that data (while not destroyed) is simply ignored. Guys, that ain’t science

If I submitted a paper like that during my time at University, my professor would have rejected it and chewed me out and ask me "what the hell are you doing and why are you doing it."

What they did violates just about every premise of legitimate science research.

THEY ARE FRAUDS!!!!!!!!!!!

[AbeKrieger]

This is what happens when you comment without reading past the headline.

Ha. You got that right. I read the headline and said "oh, no, what crock of sh!t are they pushing on us now"... I was so happy to see this was a satire piece because quite honestly I am starting to get embarrassed for the alarmists, pseudoscientists, and their enablers. They really need to get a good PR firm that will advise them to shut up and recede from popular consciousness before someone starts prosecuting their fraud, perjury and racketeering.

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[dblshot]

I’m with you, more power to them and the stuck up old men running the IOCC can “stick it”!

[JimRed]

Yeah, the data was “found”, like boxes of ballots are “found” when RATs are behind in the vote count a couple of days after the election...