Posted on 02/06/2010 3:14:27 PM PST by Talkradio03
I want to see BO’s records, all of them. That is legit. Farah, however could not have used a worse example. Both Matthew and Lukes genealogies are flawed. One having Jesus come through Nathan instead of Solomon and the other through the cursed King Jeconiah, who’s line would never sit on the throne of David.
In any case the Democrats have demonstrated they have no ideas ~ certainly not any new ones ~ and are so inept at governing that the slightest afront to their freigned dignity sends them into paroxysms of stupidity.
I don't know what TTC stands for, but would you maybe cite two or three "partial truths" that you think Jerome Corsi has promulgated.
Thanks.
ML/NJ
pissant... I can’t see how the natural-born citizen issue detracts from anything. It’s just one more thing that will show what a fraud the guy is. Some of the sheeple are already waking up realizing the deception of healthcare reform is code for taking over the economy.
These dorks that label birthers as “delusional” or bringing up a “dead end issue” are in denial about his complete fabrication of his personal history and ergo his deception as to his true political motives and disregard of the constitution.
When his house of cards comes tumbling down (the chickens come home to roooooost) and the lies about his birth status are known, all those anti-birthers will be making excuses, blaming someone else, like the MSM.
There is a vital record on file in the "Birth Index" at the Hawaii Department of Health for "Obama II, Barack Hussein" I don't know if it's valid or not. The Hawaii DoH claims that it is.
I have no idea where Obozo was born, and neither do you.
Catch up. I've said that from day one. Where Obama is concerned, it's pretty much all speculation.
“birthers being allowed to spew unsubstantiated garbage on FR without being restrained by some level of truth”
Since you’re such a great “debunker” and maintainer of a certain level of truth here on FR, why don’t you `put this issue to bed’ for us all by producing an authenticated birth certificate for the Pretender-in-Chief.
It ain’t braggin’ if you can do it, right? I’ll give you an hour to find it and post it. (And not that BS forgery that Zero’s campaign committee e-mailed to Slate in 2008.)
If you can’t, well, then you’re arguing from ignorance, which is an informal logical fallacy and a pedant’s way of saying, “Show `em or fold `em, Tex.”
I could if I went back and dug up his writings, but I’m not going to. You are free to disregard my claim.
Oh it does indeed bug, bother and chaff the liberals. Else the dear leader would not have been praying about it at his prayer breakfast. He could have ended all the speculation moons ago but apparently he cannot so he will not.
Geez. That's almost Clintonesque. Nice!
ML/NJ
Whatever suits your fancy have at it.
well said!!!. it’s hard to believe that obozo has pulled a fastone without someone tipping his hand but again see what Madoff did.I believe obozo table of cards is about to come down and hard~~~~~~~~~~~
He “cannot”.
“There is a vital record on file in the “Birth Index” at the Hawaii Department of Health for “Obama II, Barack Hussein” I don’t know if it’s valid or not. The Hawaii DoH claims that it is.”
That means nothing.
If he was born in a hospital, the certificate, like the one I linked to, would be on file.
Obozo would be better off just claiming that he was born on the streets.
Supposedly, anyone can walk in off the street and get the piece of pap that has been shown, even if not born there.
He should do the right thing and produce a birth certificate, or explain why he can not do it.
What a ridiculous, pathetic, childish, overreaction. Grow up. You’ll give me an hour? Won’t it be past your bedtime by then?
I said I try to debunk birther claims that are delusional or based on an urban legend. And I have debunked plenty of them.
Nonsense. RINOs are a dead end. Like this puke Erickson.
What suits my fancy is doing my best to discredit folks like you from posting generalizations here on FR that they cannot back up with even two specific examples. Let me know if you ever catch me doing something similar.
ML/NJ
That still nullifies the geneaolgy, as Matthew and Luke attempt to establish the Davidic line through Joseph, according to Jewish Law (through the males). (Even though most hold that Lukes account is Mary even though Luke says Joseph). Without a physical father, he can not be of the Davidic line. And if Lukes account is of Mary, Luke lists Nathan instead of Solomon....a fatal flaw.
As I said whatever floats your boat. I’m not going back 5 years or so to dig through articles Corsi wrote.
SHAME !
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.