you might not have heard it but he did say that we do nto need the FBI,CIA,NSA etc.
His supporters or some of them even on here have said that Govt has no right to tell anyone why or who they must marry including daughter and sons and yes one poster even said an animals
as for smearing well both sides use that word but mostly those on the left who like to play victim.
while i might agree with him on a couple of issues I od not on many and he comes across as a kook many times
Now if you feel like your hurt, slandered or insulted then so be it.
I’m fed up of hearing those who cry about words being used.
nearly forgot as for sex in the street then Yes some of his supporters I’ve met, in NH and down here have said Govt should not interfere with those who want to do that sort of act and yes they have used the usual line we hear so many times.
Govt has no right to tell anyone what they can and cannot do.
I don't give a diddley-squat what his "supporters" say.
Get that?
If you are going to badmouth the man, keep your rhetoric confined to HIS comments.
You can seed any crowd with idiots and then say so-and-so's supporters say "blah-blah-blah", but that does not indicate the position that so-snd-so takes on the issues.
Second-hand crap, projecting one person's beliefs on another. Liberal dung.
Now if you feel like your hurt, slandered or insulted then so be it.
It isn't ME I am worried about, but the truth. If I want bullsh*t, I can turn on CNN or MSNBC, or one of the other networks. If I come to this website, as I have been doing for considerably longer than you, and see someone spewing dreck out of their keyboard, I'm going to call them on it.
I’m fed up of hearing those who cry about words being used.
What words? "When in the course of human events...?"
"We, the people..."
Words have meanings. meanings have consequences.
If you're fed up after your short time on this site, maybe you should be somewhere else.
Our entire Constitutional Republic has long depended on the accurate interpretation of thoughts written in words, and slamming words recklessly about the page is not conducive to keeping nor restoring our Republic.
...nearly forgot as for sex in the street then Yes some of his supporters I’ve met, in NH and down here have said Govt should not interfere with those who want to do that sort of act...
Supporters said...yadda yadda yadda. What did Ron Paul say? Unless HE said he supports that, he didn't say it, did he?
Quit putting the words of others in his mouth and let him speak for himself. You just might find things he really agrees with to disagree with.
As for the TEA Party movement, Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed.
The movement afoot, no matter who wants to slap a label of some political party on it so they can generalize it or marginalize it, is simply about people saying that government has exceeded the scope of the powers the people consent to give it.
Pay attention, here.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness--That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the Governed, that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
The quote, which I hope you recognize, is from our own Declaration of Independence. It is the justification for the Revolution which followed, the reason for the existence of this Republic.
We, the People are the source of the Government's powers, not subjects to be fed crumbs from the table of the "ruling class" and pilfered at their whim. It only surprises me that it has taken this long for the people to get motivated to raise their voices in protest.